Hoi,
Given that Wikidata has identifiers to many external sources the challenge
of reconciliation is often less of a challenge for crowds and less of a
challenge than it needs to be. A few examples; the OCLC maintains two
distinct identifiers; VIAF and ISNI. They are both actively maintained.
Hi Antonin,
On 8/7/17 20:36, Antonin Delpeuch (lists) wrote:
Does anybody know an alternative to CrowdFlower that can be used for
free with volunteer workers?
There you go: https://crowdcrafting.org/
Hope this helps you keep up with your great work on openrefine.
I believe entity
Hi!
That reminds me of the crowdsourcing extension that LODrefine has - it
lets you crowdsource the manual part of the reconciliation process. But
it uses CrowdFlower for that (which is quite pricy). It'd be great if
Wikidata Game could evolve into a decent Wikimedia-focused alternative
to this
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:57 AM, André Costa wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As part of the Connected Open Heritage project Wikimedia Sverige have been
> migrating Wiki Loves Monuments datasets from Wikipedias to Wikidata.
>
> In the course of doing this we keep a note of the data
Dear André,
Great work you have done.
I am wondering whether you are aware of the issues around the Danish
dataset and the clean up apparently required.
As far as I can determine the German Wikipedia has had a number of
articles on Danish dolmens and they are also available on Wikidata. As
Hi all!
As part of the Connected Open Heritage project Wikimedia Sverige have been
migrating Wiki Loves Monuments datasets from Wikipedias to Wikidata.
In the course of doing this we keep a note of the data which we fail to
migrate. For each of these left-over bits we know which item and which