JanZerebecki added a comment.
In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875#1837495, @Cheetah90 wrote:
> Do you mean there is an article named "Information that needs to be moved to
> the correct article" for all Wikipedia content?
Yes in this example that I made up.
> 1. correctly identify
Cheetah90 added a comment.
Thanks for your response Jan!
> Why would it need to? If the information that chocolate contains caffeine is
> contained in the article "Information that needs to be moved to the correct
> article" but neither in the Chocolate nor Caffeine article then the AI could
JanZerebecki added a comment.
In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875#1835587, @Cheetah90 wrote:
> > If the AI ingested everything, this would be solved, right?
>
> Yes to some extent, since the AI system still have to figure out which are
> the correct sub-articles given a main article
Cheetah90 added a comment.
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the response!
> If the AI ingested everything, this would be solved, right?
Yes to some extent, since the AI system still have to figure out which are the
correct sub-articles given a main article from all the corpus.
> Could you give the
JanZerebecki added a comment.
Hi and welcome Allen.
> The problem we identified is that the assumption of one wikipedia article
> match one concept (might be equivalent to Wikidata item?) need to be improved
> for content completeness concern.
Wikidata is among others useful to describe that
Cheetah90 added a subscriber: Cheetah90.
Cheetah90 added a comment.
Hi Jan and Lydia,
I am one of the PhD students who are working on this main/sub-article
relationship project. The problem we identified is that the assumption of one
wikipedia article match one concept (might be equivalent to
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
Yeah. One important fundamental thing to understand maybe: Wikidata items
describe concepts. These might or might not correspond to articles on English
Wikipedia in full or in part.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875
EMAIL PREFERENCES
Halfak added a comment.
> [Wikidata items] might or might not correspond to articles on English
> Wikipedia in full or in part.
Yes. Exactly. I'm 100% with you. Yet Wikidata supports a 1:1 relationship
between a Wikipedia article and a Wikidata item. In this task/discussion I'd
like to
JanZerebecki added a comment.
What is one precise relationship you are suggesting, that is still missing?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Lydia_Pintscher, JanZerebecki
Cc:
JanZerebecki added a subscriber: JanZerebecki.
JanZerebecki added a comment.
I think Lydia actually answered your question. "United States" its "history of
topic" (`P2184`) is "History of the United States". But "History of the United
States" is "facet of" "History" and "United States". "facet
Halfak added a comment.
Thanks @Lydia, but I think there is some confusion here. Presumably, the
"History of the United States" article could be merged into the "United States"
article. In fact, it once was! It is strictly a sub-article. Yet, "History
of the United States" is an "aspect
11 matches
Mail list logo
