Denny created this task.
Denny added a subscriber: Denny.
Denny added projects: MediaWiki-extensions-UniversalLanguageSelector,
MediaWiki-extensions-WikibaseClient.
TASK DESCRIPTION
When I click on the ULS widget, nothing happens.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T85541
REPLY
Denny added a comment.
No, /entity/Q23 is not the description, indeed, it is the item.
Refer also to http://korrekt.org/papers/Wikidata-RDF-export-2014.pdf (as per
IRC chat).
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89949
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files
Denny added a subscriber: Denny.
Denny added a comment.
I am quite strongly against splitting the label and description by the aliases.
The label and description together establish the identity of the item, whereas
the aliases (which is indeed a bad term) are used to facilitate finding
Denny added a subscriber: Denny.
Denny added a comment.
But maybe name it More, Even more, All ;)
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92759
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign
username.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https
Denny added a comment.
Since the top line is not directly editable anymore anyway, also an option
could be to set the Label in big letters in the top, description next to it
(not under it), and the aliases below. This should also be pleasing
aesthetically, and keeping the semantic unity
Denny added a comment.
I don't know the Open License. Given what I understand using automatic translation, the license requires attribution.
So if the RNSR is a database in the sense of the Database Right directive, and if the RNSR is licensed under the Open License, and if the Open License
Denny added a comment.
The property is about adding the RNSR ID. That's fine.
On the data import hub page you linked, I don't see a mention of the license. Nor on your talk page. I find this upload problematic.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T193728EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps
Denny added a comment.
@Psychoslave, I am not sure I entirely follow.
You said "there are contributors of Wikidata that do make massive imports of external data banks, regardless of the corresponding terms of use."
Then you refer to an email on a closed list that I cannot acces
Denny added a comment.
@Psychoslave sorry to disagree on the questions, but are we in any disagreement on these three questions?
We should not allow the (significant) import of data from databases which are licensed under a license incompatible with CC-0.
We should enforce that.
We should
Denny added a comment.
@Nemo_bis thanks, I agree with your point a lot.
But regarding your question - just because there is a database which happens to reproducible should not trigger any right issues.
To give an example: it is easy to imagine a company that sells the list of all countries
Denny added a comment.
@Rspeer regarding the ontology: the ontology of Wikidata is genuinely unique and not copied from any Wikipedia project, or any other project. It has been created on Wikidata.
Regarding the translations: we are talking about the labels of things in different languages
Denny added a comment.
@Nemo_bis : good point. I wouldn't know what a good example is, though, maybe someone else can come up with something.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T193728EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: DennyCc: Lofhi
Denny added a comment.
Re Psychoslave:
Having a statement in Wikidata with a reference, where the referenced work is not published under CC-0, is entirely fine in my understanding.
As a comparison: Wikipedia has plenty of references, where the referenced work is not published under CC-BY-SA
Denny added a comment.
Re Pintoch:
No, I was seriously not aware that we are uploading datasets
I think it is fair to say that this is not exactly an isolated case (but I am surprised that you seem (to pretend) not to know? Maybe for legal reasons?)
No, no legal reasons, I really didn't know
Denny added a comment.
@Gnom1 - yes, anything that you can contribute would be awesome.
Unfortunately, this request here is all over the place, ranging from the question whether it is legally permissible to have a statement reference Wikipedia to the way inline images are displayed, so it might
Denny added a comment.
"what are the benefit for the Wikimedia community of using exclusively CC-0 for its single Wikibase instance usable in the rest of its environment?"
This question is, I think, less suitable for a lawyer. I think this is a very interesting question, but I'd rather
Denny added a comment.
@Micru I agree with @Cirdan that this would be a rather worrying way to deal with the situation. Also, as @Nemo_bis points out, it really couldn't be just the communities doing so. In my understanding, it would need an update to the CC license itself, which would need
Denny added a comment.
@Rspeer
Copyright has to be about some concrete _expression_.
Are you claiming that the interwiki links that used to be in Wikipedia articles until five years ago should have had copyright protection? Their concrete _expression_ was [[en:London]] [[fr:Londres]] [[hr:London
Denny added a comment.
I was reading the article you linked to - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6pfungsh%C3%B6he#Sch%C3%B6pfungsh%C3%B6he_seit_2013 - and nothing there lets me believe that the list of Interwikilinks would have sufficient "Schöpfungshöhe".TASK D
Denny added a comment.
@MisterSynergy yes, I agree, it would seriously weaken Wikidata. Nevertheless it is good to resolve legal uncertainties as far as reasonable.
Regarding Gnom1 - well, he did write the previous, official answer by Wikilegal, which is why I consider that a great offer. But I
Denny added a comment.
@Rspeer
My previous suggestion to @Psychoslave was
P) "Can you comment on the practise of extracting data from Wikipedia articles, which are published under CC-BY-SA, and storing the results in Wikidata, where they are published under CC-0?"
I guess th
Denny added a comment.
@Mateusz_Konieczny I like R-OSM-1 too. I would go now for these two questions.
I'd really like to have @Psychoslave chime in, as he was the one opening this bug and certainly being the most vocal on this topic, as far as I have seen, so I will leave this open for a few days
Denny added a comment.
@Rspeer If I link an article from the German Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia by adding an interwiki link on the German Wikipedia, and then an interwiki bot makes this link be reciprocal by adding the interwiki link on the English Wikipedia, there is no attribution to me
Denny added a comment.
You state that "there are contributors of Wikidata that do make massive imports of external data banks, regardless of the corresponding terms of use."
Can you point to such imports?
In my opinion, we should treat such license issues on Wikidata as seriou
Denny added a comment.
That looks neat.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201000EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: DennyCc: Denny, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, RazShuty, WMDE-leszek, Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86
Denny added a comment.
I tried Lucas suggestion, and it solves the reason for the bug. When there
are two actions, it still works fine (but their relative positioning of the
action icons changes slightly - they squeeze together).
Functionality wise, his suggested fix works.
Here's
Denny created this task.
Denny added projects: Wikidata Mobile, Wikidata-Termbox, Wikidata, Mobile.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper.
TASK DESCRIPTION
When using Chrome on my Pixel 3a, since the new Termbox has launched (which,
by the way, is awesome), it is hard
Denny added a comment.
In Chrome. But it does not happen on the first gloss (since Remove is grayed
out on the first gloss), only on the second and other additional glosses.
The part with the "Remove" is kinda OK. I would prefer it would jump to
Remove only if I left the g
Denny created this task.
Denny added a project: Wikidata.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper.
TASK DESCRIPTION
When I search for Lexeme:Danke from the Search box in Wikidata (upper right
corner) I get the message
[XYqWIwpAADoAAJk2AOEAAABL] 2019-09-24 22:18:11: Fatal
Denny added a comment.
Oh, wow, it also happens for Lexeme:thanks
I am super curious what is happening here!
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233763
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Denny
Cc: Aklapper, Denny
Denny created this task.
Denny added projects: Wikidata, Lexicographical data.
TASK DESCRIPTION
When creating a Sense in a Lexeme, I choose the language, tab to the field,
enter the gloss, tab to Remove (which should preferably tab to Add instead),
tab again to Add, press return, it adds
31 matches
Mail list logo
