Hoi,
First things first ... that is getting Wikidata to work for its initial
purposes. Automated updates from elsewhere are nice but introduce a
complete new set of issues including reliability.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 9 April 2012 03:25, JFC Morfin jef...@jefsey.com wrote:
Is there an objection
Hello!
What about the engine of Wikidata?
Do you think MediaWiki is good for structured data?
I think MediaWiki should be greatly modified at least to be proper engine
for Wikidata.
The best thing would be to create new engine specially for structured data.
It would be also better for
At 11:55 09/04/2012, Soslan Khubulov wrote:
The best thing would be to create new engine specially for
structured data. It would be also better for Wikitionary.
Just remember what was Mediawiki created for. Storing marked up text
pages. Mediawiki is good for encyclopedia but not for Wikitionary
At 11:55 09/04/2012, Soslan Khubulov wrote:
The best thing would be to create new engine specially for
structured data. It would be also better for Wikitionary.
Just remember what was Mediawiki created for. Storing marked up text
pages. Mediawiki is good for encyclopedia but not for Wikitionary
On 4/8/12 9:25 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
Is there an objection to the concept of, or cooperation with,
datawiki Wikidata compatible projects? I would define a datawiki
(as there are databases) as a JSON oriented NoSQL DBMS using an
enhanced wiki as a human user I/O interface.
Why are you turning
Hello Solan
We do not plan to use MediaWiki's data model (rich text) or editing concept
(text based markup editing) for Wikidata. We will use a structured data model
with form-based ajax enhanced editing.
We however do plan to implement Wikidata based on MediaWiki in order to be able
to
Hey guys,
what about setting up a wiki with a summary of the project? Mailing
lists with lots of traffic are hard to follow... For start we could
move the couple of pages from Meta there...
Kozuch
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 15:30, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
We'll probably
move the development related documents there to mediawiki.org soon
though.
That would allow us to use the LiquidThreads extension to discuss or
keep track of discussions about the project.
Hi all;
There is a category for the logo proposals. I invite you to add your logos
there http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikidata_logo_proposals
Just sign up in Wikimedia Commons, follow the Special:Upload form and add
[[Category:Wikidata logo proposals]] to the page description.
On 09.04.2012 20:39, Helder wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 15:30, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
We'll probably
move the development related documents there to mediawiki.org soon
though.
That would allow us to use the LiquidThreads extension to discuss or
keep track of
By counting instances of the templates emitting microformats. For
example, on en.WP, {{Coord}} alone emits 757,299 'geo' (coordinates)
microformats [1]; {{Infobox settlement}} emits 273,300 hCard (place)
microformats [2] - that's over a million, alone. {{Infobox person}}
emits 105,623 hCard
Dear Kinsely,
It seems we all say roughly the same thing from differents points of
view or even data cultures - our objective being not to make our
personal culture prevail but to be able to converge in feeding
wikidata with reliable, IP protected, referential data.
At 14:55 09/04/2012,
Thanks, I have worked with {{coord}} templates in the past but didn't have a
good handle of the volume of transclusion of other microformat-enabled
templates.
Sad to hear about SmackBot XV, hope something can be done to resume the request.
Dario
On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Dear Wikidata,
I just wanted to let you know that I have spent a couple of hours
translating the Wikidata FAQ into French.
= See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/FAQ/fr
I also went after the first Wikidata documentation and published an
introduction to the project, as a proof that I did
14 matches
Mail list logo
