Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Denny Vrandečić
done this change. 2013/6/20 Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de Thinking about it again, and discussing it internally, maybe we should replace word with expression and meaning with sense? Any +1's or differing opinions? 2013/6/20 Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de

Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] Impressions from LODLAM 2013

2013-06-21 Thread Andrea Zanni
Hi David, really thanks for this email. I'm at OAI8 (conference of Open Access in Geneva), with several fellow wikimedians, and I'd like to express some thoughts related to yours. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:47 AM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote: All this led me to think about the emotional

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Antoine Amarilli
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:59:13PM +0100, Neil Harris wrote: WordNet does not seem to be under a free license -- see http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/license/ Since Wikidata's CC0 licensing allows commercial use, surely integrating any kind of data from WordNet risks conflict with

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Denny, when you look at the data currently in Wikidata, you find what is in essence more than a basis for a translation dictionary. The notion that we need something separate is a notion you should reasses. What we need is some clean-up of the labels currently in use. What we also need are

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Denny Vrandečić
It was never intended to create a Wiktionary Database separate from Wikidata, but have it being a part of Wikidata. 2013/6/21 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com Hoi, Denny, when you look at the data currently in Wikidata, you find what is in essence more than a basis for a

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Jan Dudík
Ww do need another wikidata, only separate namespace for items (words) and some separate properties JAnD 2013/6/21 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com: We do not need another Wikidata for Wiktionary Thanks, GerarM ___ Wikidata-l

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Sven Manguard
Did you mean to say We do *not* need another Wikidata? Otherwise I am confused by your comment. On Jun 21, 2013 12:08 PM, Jan Dudík jan.du...@gmail.com wrote: Ww do need another wikidata, only separate namespace for items (words) and some separate properties JAnD 2013/6/21 Gerard Meijssen

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Am 21.06.2013 14:44, schrieb Gerard Meijssen: Hoi, Denny, when you look at the data currently in Wikidata, you find what is in essence more than a basis for a translation dictionary. I would say it's excellent as a thesaurus which can be used for cross-lingual tagging, named entity

Re: [Wikidata-l] Some Wiktionary data in Wikidata

2013-06-21 Thread David Cuenca
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Daniel Kinzler daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de wrote: For literature grade translations, that is, for a true dictionary, I believe that you need to full range of nuances attached to each word and each word sense, which is distinct from the platonic concepts

[Wikidata-l] weekly summary #63

2013-06-21 Thread Lydia Pintscher
Heya folks :) Here's your summary of what happened around Wikidata this week: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2013_06_21 Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Community Communications for Technical Projects Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.

Re: [Wikidata-l] Is an ecosystem of Wikidatas possible?

2013-06-21 Thread Jane Darnell
I was thinking about items vs properties and Commons. I am not sure a F entity is necessary. In theory, each file on Commons can be linked to another one, and each item on WikiData can be linked to another one, but those links do not necessarily need to interconnect with Commons. If a Commons file