Hey folks :)
You're all awesome for creating pretty logos! Love them.
Can you all add them to
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikidata#WikiData_logo_candidate
please so we don't lose any of them?
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Community Communications
The ISO Standard sounds very interesting, but the price is really a problem.
If I understand this correctly alone the basic quantities in cutting and
grinding part 3 are 66 CHF
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?ics1=01ics2=060ics3=csnumber=8055
which
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:07 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/5 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
However if this is not going to happen in Wikidata
itself there is probably demand for a separate instance where this
would be possible.
What do you mean?
What I mean is
Ah, ok. There will be wikidatafarms like Wikia-data : )
2012/4/5 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:07 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/5 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
However if this is not going to happen in Wikidata
itself
Lydia wrote:
I would like that this project could serve in that manner
the scientific community and provide standards for submission of data
for scientist. Any plans in this direction?
The en.wikipedia page on big data should give the answers, if it
was kept current with the current Big Data
Yury Katkov: As far as I know, sometimes thedrafts of ISO standards are
available for free. Is there a free draft version somewhere
One can get some text information within the ISO database, here is the
documentation:
Alexander,
I think the unit of measurement and uncertainty can be stored in auxiliary
Snaks.
Sofia
2012/4/5 Alexander Täschner tasc...@uni-muenster.de
Hi!
I am a particle physicists, so I'm interested in using the Wikidata
project in order to keep physical constants, like the mass or
Heya :)
There is a new mailing list that will get all the bugmail related to
Wikidata. You can subscribe at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs if you want
to get them.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Community Communications for
Semantic MediaWiki makes this correctly.
Wikipedia uses to save numeric data without thousand separator, and the use
{{formatnum:}} magic word.
For conversions, see this example http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Berlin,
the km2 is converted to sq mi using [[Corresponds to::]]
The label and the description together are meant to be identifying.
I.e. Georgia - A country in central Asia, or Frankfurt - A city in
Hesse, Germany, etc.
Additionally, the Wikipedia links provide quite some guidance to it.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/4/5 Gregor Hagedorn g.m.haged...@gmail.com
Dear Martynas,
if you try to model the following statement in RDF
The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per
square kilometer, according to the Bilan demographique 2010.
you might notice that RDF requires a reification of the statement. The data
model that you have
On 04/04/12 23:23, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
Wikidata can (and probably will) store information about each moon of
Uranus, e.g., its mass. It does probably not make sense to store the mass of
Moons of Uranus if there is such an article. It does not help to know that
the article Moons on Uranus also
Hi Denny -
Thanks for your reply and I am relieved. The design seems in the process of
walking towards looking quite alot like ISO Topic Maps, I must say, because
it designates no wall of separation between classes and topics. Today that
wall exists in SMW in the dichotomy of Category vs
You guys experiencing problems with reading mailing lists want
probably start using Gmail, as it nicely agregates mails in threads so
you can read it is a forum-style...
2012/4/4 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com:
On 04/04/12 06:33, aniketkarmar...@aniketkarmarkar.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I must
I have to admit that it is easy to miss the overview. What about a
Facebook group?
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
You guys experiencing problems with reading mailing lists want
probably start using Gmail, as it nicely agregates mails in threads so
you can
2012/4/6 Leukippos Institute leukipposinstit...@googlemail.com
I have to admit that it is easy to miss the overview. What about a
Facebook group?
You can't organize the most important project for Internet in a while using
that thing called Facebook.
I am not fixed to fb. I was just thinking about a place where we can
have a structured look to the posts and the responses. I miss the
overview with all this emails. Any suggestions?
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:13 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/6 Leukippos Institute
Hi John,
no, you have seen correctly that there is no separation between classes and
instances. If this brings our model closer to topic maps, then this is
convenient.
I have to admit that my knowledge of topic maps is quite limited. As far as
I understand it, they are an ISO standard and can be
Denny said:
But if you find a simpler, and more RDFish way to express the (below)
statement, please feel free to enlighten me. I would be indeed very
interested.
The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per square
kilometer, according to the Bilan demographique 2010.
A
John,
your suggestion has two requirements that I think are hard to achieve:
* first, we need an agreement on the set of (non-overlapping but complete)
types that exist in the world
* second, we would need to assume that the Wikidata editors would agree on
one and exactly one type for every
Hi All,
Our data (using a 25-language dataset) agrees with Denny's. 99% of all
connected components of the interlanguage link graph have only one article per
language edition. This is something we looked into in some detail in our paper
at ACM's CHI conference this year
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 18:27, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
You guys experiencing problems with reading mailing lists want
probably start using Gmail, as it nicely agregates mails in threads so
you can read it is a forum-style...
+1
___
Thanks, Brent! I was hoping to get some numbers exactly from you :)
I am extremely curious what kind of statements people will make in the
Wikidata page about art, privacy, agriculture, army, etc. I am
looking forward to see what the community will add there. That'll be fun to
watch :)
(Usually,
John,
thanks! I fully agree.
And this is indeed pretty much what we have in our data model.*
I think that we really need to get our draft mapping to RDF done, in order
to show that we align pretty much with this suggestion.
Cheers,
Denny
* well, we also add density, but I think that is merely
Denny said:
you forgot to add something like
France#Density:2012_pop_estimate_Bilan_2010 property Density .
No I did not forget anything, given the Density 'namespace' in the subobject
name.
IOW your triple merely restates what is discernible from the subobject name.
Maybe you should tell me what
It's more accurate to say that your belief is an artifact of present tools.
RDF has just one way to associate a Class with an object, the rdf:type
attribute. Specifically because RDF makes no distinction between classes
that represent a type-of-thing (eg a Character) and classes that represent a
26 matches
Mail list logo
