Hi John,
This is very useful information. According to the Budapest and Berlin
statements, resources provided in open access would be OER, I think. Since
the concept has become ambiguous through the different practices, the
distinction between "libre" and "gratis" clarifies most of the current
; Regards,
>
> John
>
>
> http://www.wikieducator.org/User:JohnWS
> http://johnsearth.blogspot.com
>
> --- On *Wed, 11/23/11, José Mota * wrote:
>
>
> From: José Mota
> Subject: [WikiEducator] Re: Are open access repositories OER?
> To: wikieducator@googlegro
tm#gratis-libre)
Regards,
John
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:JohnWShttp://johnsearth.blogspot.com
--- On Wed, 11/23/11, José Mota wrote:
From: José Mota
Subject: [WikiEducator] Re: Are open access repositories OER?
To: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2011,
Hi José
Yes you are correct, the default position in the absence of any license
statement is all-rights reserved, unless the copyright has expired and the
resource is in the public domain.
Agreed -- while open access is better than no access, from an intellectual
property rights perspective these
Thank you Ellen, Daniel and Wayne for your feedback :-),
I think I am not mistaken in thinking that the default of anything
available for free online that doesn't have a license or explicit terms of
use is traditional copyright. In my view, that is the case with
repositories (I am referring to
