Hi Peter and Leigh and WikiEducators --
PLEASE READ THE NEXT STEPS SECTION AT THE END OF THIS POST
I like the featured content resource suggestion -- something we also
alluded to in one of our earlier in our discussions on the topic:
http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator/browse_frm/thread
Leigh,
Maybe you said it better than me. But this is the point I am trying to
make with the use of a maturity model. It allows the community engaged
in the direct creation and use / reuse of the content to also define a
localized version of quality. Yes, I believe we need to avoid a
colonized ver
As a suggestion maybe.. what about a "page of the month" project. It only
celebrates a few pages, without a site wide application of quality
indicators. The page of the month isn't necessarily determined by quality,
but rather is only meant to draw focus on different projects by interviewing
the pe
I am coming into the quality discussion late. I have tried to read all the
threads here and in the wiki. I don't think I have see a comment along these
lines:
A quality indication on works leads me and others to wonder "who's quality".
It's an obvious comment really, and I'm sure it has been menti
Hi Leo,
These are good examples of the kinds of processes that should be
incorporated into our evolving capability maturity model for WE. These
are the key processes that will help us in building the quality we
are striving for.
I think that the challenge we are going to face is related to the
Hi Peter and Leo
Good discussion -- although I think we may be talking cross purposes
here? That is saying the same thing from different perspectives.
I think the extent that content is reused and recontextualised is an
excellent of the health of our community.
You're right -- the measure of th
Thank you Peter , you are amazing ! I am reading what you and Wayne wrote
very carefully and really learning a lot from both of you .I am not sure if
I understand the animal analogy , I would like to give my 2 cents to this on
the quality or healthy wiki resources .
1 What is the purpose of the ed
Wayne,
I believe we are trying to push into new ground. That of measuring the
quality of wiki based OER. And I like that Leo agreed, reuse and
recontextualization is most important.
I also believe that the only people who can measure the health of a
Grade 7 geography lesson for Pakistan are the p
Hi Peter,
Thanks for starting this thread --- these are tough and challenging
questions.
I think we need to think about whose temperature we're measuring
. Is it the content or is it the community. So when we're
talking about the health of the WE OER community -- this is something
different from
Leo,
This criterion came from my head. I believe the list could be much
longer and I hope we grow the list in the context of the WikiEducator
Quality Assurance initiative.
http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review
If you want to see a list of references that helped m
Wow this is a so important thread , thank you for bring that up
, I think the healthy wiki enviorment would be the Number 5 below , the
number of times it has been reused and recontextulized and Number 6 the
number of different countries that use it
1 I think it is so important that ev
11 matches
Mail list logo
