It's a major issue, and needs recognition as such and a cultural problem,
not just on ANI but anywhere it happens.
FT2.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems like the trick is to work toward implementing this as an actual
cultural ideology,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:43:05 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
en:wp does allow quite a few historic images under fair use. And no,
they're not safe. But we're in this for the long haul, not a pretty
page today.
If you post any fair-use images, you'd better be prepared to defend
them and jump
IAR isn't for a regular, predictable, situation where a generic agreed
solution would be better, and not for a sourcing issue or systematic
problem like this. More and more often there is a chance (small in any
given case, large overall) that important information for an article may be
blog
I like the approach, but sources are more or less reliable, not
absolutely R or not-R. The factors you list affect the degree of
reliability, but where to put the bar so it can be used in Wikipedia
will vary with different subjects, and with different purposes. (for
example, the bar for
Can you explain and suggest what you mean here?
FT2
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:46 PM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip)
Perhaps a rewording not using absolute terms
might work better--NFCC has shown the disadvantages of using in an
absolute sense things that need to be
1. the content is significant to the purpose of the article, or NPOV
would be compromised if absent;
2. the content is not published in a more reliable easily available source;
3. the author's details and the origins of the material
(authenticity) is not in significant good-faith question;
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, FT2 wrote:
So I would be okay with a solution that
extended and built upon SELFPUB. For example:
It's a nice try, but it still has the limitation to not being about third
parties. We clearly can't just do away with that completely, but it needs
to be relaxed somehow.
On 18/07/2010, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
IAR isn't for a regular, predictable, situation where a generic agreed
solution would be better, and not for a sourcing issue or systematic
problem like this. More and more often there is a chance (small in any
given case, large overall) that
