doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com
To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009 23:45:19 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Flagged revs poll take 2
Your argument is spurious.
It may well be that this proposal is the only one that would
: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009 23:45:19 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Flagged revs poll take 2
Your argument is spurious.
It may well be that this proposal is the only one that would pass - but
that neither means that it is good, nor that it is a good thing
To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009 23:45:19 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Flagged revs poll take 2
Your argument is spurious.
It may well be that this proposal is the only one that would pass
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And yet this poll seems to have significantly more support across the board
than any other proposal that has been put forward. If there's another way of
taking it forward that would have sufficient support,
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Nathan wrote:
Well, the poll was closed with 80% support. It probably should have
been
extended, if for no other reasons than that votes continued to come
in at a
pretty good clip and there is no pressing reason to close it on
deadline.
If I were a
I didn't see any lazylinks in this thread, so appearently *this* is the
poll being discussed here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions/Poll
Will Johnson
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
New plan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions
New poll (closing 1 April):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions/Poll
Bugzilla request (before poll end, but it won't be actioned until
after the devs'
With all due respect, this isn't exactly new: it's been open for almost
two weeks now. Is there a particular reason it's being posted to the list at
this point?
- GlassCobra
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 5:48 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
New plan:
2009/3/29 Alex Sawczynec glasscobr...@gmail.com:
With all due respect, this isn't exactly new: it's been open for almost
two weeks now. Is there a particular reason it's being posted to the list at
this point?
The proposal's been discussed extensively on here before, but I for
one had no idea
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Carcharoth
carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Alex Sawczynec glasscobr...@gmail.com
wrote:
With all due respect, this isn't exactly new: it's been open for almost
two weeks now. Is there a particular reason it's being posted
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Alex Sawczynec glasscobr...@gmail.com
wrote:
With all due respect, this isn't exactly new: it's been open for almost
two weeks now. Is there a particular reason it's being posted
11 matches
Mail list logo
