Le 2013-06-11 14:09, Fred Bauder a écrit :
There will always be humans maintaining the system who must, in order
to
do their work, have potential access to everything.
A potential access to everything is a so vast and vague assertion
that it practicaly denote nothing.
Also, one could come
That sounds interesting!
What does a Chapter's Chief Scientific Officer do?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Manuel Schneider
manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:05:45 +0200
Von:Chantal Ebongué
https://www.wikimedia.ch/scientific-director
Reporting directly to the board and working in close collaboration with the
Chief Administrative Officer, the CSO will be responsible for all the free
knowledge related projects conducted inside the association.
He/she will work with the community,
Katy Love, 11/06/2013 22:52:
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/Staff_summary/Progress_report_form/Q1
Funny: «WMF notes [stats]», «WMFR claims [stats]».
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Given that this is an assessment that is being performed by paid staff, I
think it's unreasonable to think that the staff would issue more than very
mild criticism (Your report is so great it makes everyone else look
terrible!), even if the report was so poor as to deserve criticism. I'm
not
Alex
2013/6/6 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
Ziko van Dijk, 06/06/2013 15:00:
I also think that it should not be seen as blasphemy when someone suggests
to reconsider a Wikimedia project. (Remember Asaf's session in Milan.)
Isn't Wikispecies not already redundant because in
Hi Katy,
thanks for sharing.
As a minor suggestion, to me it would be helpful if you could be a little
more specific than 'we' in your responses. Are you in those instances
speaking for your own (with your specific expertise), for a group of WMF
staffers, for the FDC, for the whole Foundation
Reminder: This office hour will be in a little over an hour from the time
of sending.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Siebrand Mazeland (WMF)
smazel...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Event Details
# Date: 2013-06-12
# Time: 1700-1800 UTC, 1000-1100 PDT
#IRC channel: #wikimedia-office on
I encourage everyone to join the StopWatching campaign, individually.
It also seems like the right thing for Wikimedia to stand for; our
projects are among the more prominent supporters of anonymous and
pseudonymous knowledge-work on the web.
SJ
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Luis Villa
Hoi,
A species database does not contain the same information you are likely
to find in an encyclopaedia. When you want to be comprehensive in a
database about species, you will include many revisions of genera, of
species and more. When you care about such things, have a look at IPNI.
Thanks,
Ah, thanks for the information. And this encyclopedia of life, isn't that
the project suitable?
Kind regards
Ziko
Ziko van Dijk
voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland
deputy chair Wikimedia Chapters Association
Isn't that more program/project management rather than science?
Thanks,
Mike
On 12 Jun 2013, at 10:53, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
https://www.wikimedia.ch/scientific-director
Reporting directly to the board and working in close collaboration with the
Chief Administrative Officer, the CSO
Le 2013-06-11 14:09, Fred Bauder a écrit :
There will always be humans maintaining the system who must, in order to
do their work, have potential access to everything.
A potential access to everything is a so vast and vague assertion
that it practicaly denote nothing.
Also, one could come
I don't know exactly the selection of this definition, but I suppose
that it has been due to the choice to don't be project manager because
any project has its own project manager.
He is project manager in some cases but for other projects is mainly a
supervisor.
About the projects I would
14 matches
Mail list logo
