Dear Wikimedians,
We are delighted to update you today regarding the upcoming Wikimedia
Conference[1], which will be held in Berlin on April 10-13, 2014. We,
Daniela and Wenke from WMDE's event team, look forward to making the
logistics as smoothly as possible for everyone involved and to
On 22 January 2014 08:35, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many ways to skin a cat. The most obvious
one is to add a {{Reasonator}} template as a place
holder in a Wikipedia. Another is to capture a not
found or a red link and insert Reasonator info. What
I am
Hi Andy,
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the
What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
pages in the main namespace?
Daniel
--
http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/en/institution/mitarbeiter/mietchen-daniel/
Hoi,
Having Reasonator generated content in a draft namespace is *NOT* a bad
idea.
- I do not know enough about the draft namespace.. Is there a way to
discover that an article exists in Draft ??
- My personal target for this functionality is very much the smaller
projects. By using a
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Mietchen
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com wrote:
What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
pages in the main namespace?
Daniel
It is still far too early to
Hi, Ms Alex, Hi everyone.
Congrats to Ms. Alex Wang, hats off to your 'much experience in thedeveloping
world'.
nice pics
nice to come across you.
(Kadambas,Royals of South India, Our proud heritage, Secrets of Velliapura)
by: Siyona, Goa, India.
__
Hoi,
We can provide information now(ish). We are discussing draft because it is
a likely avenue. It is however very much NOT intended for the English
Wikipedia. If anything it would be much better if we work this out on other
Wikipedias first.
The most benefit from Reasonator will be for the
On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would
be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on
10 matches
Mail list logo