On Oct 30, 2014 6:06 AM, James Alexander jameso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Allan J. Aguilar ral...@vmail.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:15:17 -0500
Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
To address
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:48 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
wrote:
The license is clear, and wmf is an expert in these licenses . So a
previous trademark is void in the respect where it restricts what is
defined in the license?
Rupert
I'm sorry, I don't completely understand
Very interesting. I started use it.
El 2014-10-29 20:38, Asaf Bartov escribió:
This is great, thanks!
A.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:10 AM, James Forrester
jdforres...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 10:56:42 Denny Vrandečić vrande...@google.com
wrote:
There’s a small tool on
Here's mine:
Usuario:Wa17gs https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Wa17gs
Walter Gomez Segura
*Finance Fellow*
*149 New Montgomery St., San Francisco, CA., 94105*
www.wikimediafoundation.org
wagseg...@wikimedia.org
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:19 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Still traveling, but let me see if I can briefly dispel some of the
confusion.
CC BY-SA 3.0 grants users the right to use an image under copyright law. It
does not cover trademark rights. The goal of trademark rights is to protect
the logo from being used in a way that confuses the public.
Hi,
Just a note: we can update the license on Commons, but I noticed that
the files were copied locally on https://wikimediafoundation.org/
Someone with the right priviledges will have to do it there.
Regards,
Yann
2014-10-30 17:30 GMT+01:00 Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org:
Still
Hi Michael!
This is a bit of a surprise, if I am honest! I applaud the idea but it has
come out of the blue and I worry that this extra layer of reporting will
increase overheads here - when our overheads are already under scrutiny. I
have a few preliminary questions:
- Do you have an idea of
Interesting development. Probably a very good idea for transparency and
good use of the movement's money, and consistency of reporting to make
things comparable is a great goal. I especially think that for smaller
chapters there is lots of value in having a dedicated contact person!
But I find
Dear all,
The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday,
November 6, 2014 at 7 PM UTC (11 AM PST). The IRC channel is
#wikimedia-office on irc.freenode.net and the meeting will be broadcast as
a live YouTube stream.
The current structure of the meeting is:
* Welcoming
We have the honour of inviting you to the celebration of the official
constitution of Wikimedia Belgium asbl/vzw.
Wikimedia Belgium asbl/vzw has been recognised by the worldwide Wikimedia
Foundation as an official chapter, that supports the quest for and promotes
a universal and freely
To clarify, Romaine is talking about an event to be held in Brussels.
A.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have the honour of inviting you to the celebration of the official
constitution of Wikimedia Belgium asbl/vzw.
Wikimedia Belgium
Hello WMF Finance Fellows and welcome to the wikimedia movement,
I'm pleased to see this project and look forward to following your work.
I left a comment/question of the talk page. Please move it to the main page
if you think it is more appropriate.
Hi Romaine,
good news.
Considering that the event is connected with the official recognition, I
suppose you have a bylaws but in the website I can find any.
Regards
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have the honour of inviting you to the
Liam:
My apologies for the language you noted, it was not our intent to, even
inadvertently, to degrade anyone. We fully appreciate the abilities of our
community and I know from my meetings with members of our community how
smart and engaged they are in a variety of issues impacting the
James, I have a question. Should you merge the items or the tool will do
it?
El 2014-10-29 19:10, James Forrester escribió:
On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 10:56:42 Denny Vrandečić vrande...@google.com
wrote:
There’s a small tool on WMF labs that you can use to verify the links
(it
displays the
Hello Ilario,
You can find our statutes from this page:
https://be.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapter_Statutes_%26_Bylaws
Greetings,
Romaine
Foundation of Wikimedia Belgium:
https://be.wikimedia.org/wiki/Foundation_of_Wikimedia_Belgium
Become a member:
Michael Guss wrote:s
A meta page
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement-wide_Financial_Report
was created for the project, in order to make the information accessible
to everyone and create a space for discussion and/or suggestions. We
strongly encourage you to share with us what types of
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:16 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Labs is a playground and Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums are
serious enough to warrant a proper investment of resources, in my view.
Magnus and many others develop magnificent tools, but my
Hi.
Splitting this out from the GLAMs/Chapters thread, I continue to regularly
wonder whether we need stricter guidelines and guidance in the area of
experimenting on Wikimedians.
Erik mentioned trying to further implement A/B testing in software
development, but to me that quickly raises
19 matches
Mail list logo
