Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:04 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
WereSpielChequers wrote:
One of the areas that I would like to see the foundation putting in money
is for the running and maintenance of wanted orphan bots.
I think specific examples might help here.
... and
When was odder put on moderation, and what for?
On 24 Feb 2015 14:49, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
John Mark Vandenberg, 23/02/2015 21:59:
Which email ? the crowdfunding email?
Yes, because odder is in moderation (like many others, it seems).
Nemo
After thinking about John's response, I've realized that those works should
go into public domain (actually, under CC-BY, as Serbian laws don't
recognize PD outside strictly defined works not created by author in the
sense of laws and other similar works; it's been explicitly stated that
moral
Hello,
On English Wikipedia I have met with resistance in documenting crowdfunding
projects. I would like clarity on the extent to which the Wikimedia
community feels that it is acceptable to discuss crowdfunding in Wikimedia
community information channels.
I posted about this on the talk page
On 24 February 2015 at 01:25, ido ivri idoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Today, we're kicking-off a two-week community consultation about the future
of Wikimedia.
Why only these two questions? And why only two weeks? I fear this is not
really a consultation but a survey.
+1. With a two week window
On 24 February 2015 at 13:55, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like the answer to this question too.
Could there be some transparency please? I believe it would be a good
time for the list mods to publicly decide how appeals to moderation or
list-bans should work in a way that is credibly
Maggie Dennis wrote:
You could be on to something there, Craig. :) I think it's fair to say
that somebody might change his mind in five years for all kinds of
reasons - including being asked nicely. This process is obviously geared
to differ widely from the last. Hopefully it will be a good
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:59 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Which email ? the crowdfunding email?
Austin, do the list admins have another perspective to justify their
action?
--
John Vandenberg
I'd like the answer to this question too.
I largely agree with Risker.
I was not involved in the last consultation. I'm taking a wait and see
approach with this one.
My hard-earned experience on this mailing list is that an approach of
problem solving rather than stone throwing tends to get more cooperation
and better results. I still
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Cristian Consonni
kikkocrist...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-24 15:52 GMT+01:00 Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com:
On English Wikipedia I have met with resistance in documenting crowdfunding
projects. I would like clarity on the extent to which the Wikimedia
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com wrote:
With more and more Wikimedians engaging in crowdfunding, I suppose we
can talk about whether the mailing list for Wikimedia movement
organization is the place to advertise in this way. For my part, I
don't think a simple
Thanks for your replies, and for John's very kind offer. As this involves
various inactive and semi inactive bot operators I will give John an off list
response re that.
On MzMcBride's points, I don't know the relative costs of employing programmers
in San Francisco v other parts of the world.
2015-02-24 15:52 GMT+01:00 Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com:
On English Wikipedia I have met with resistance in documenting crowdfunding
projects. I would like clarity on the extent to which the Wikimedia
community feels that it is acceptable to discuss crowdfunding in Wikimedia
community
Hopefully this was just an error than. When is Nemo being un-moderated?
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I would actually say: Is there a point to have a prescriptive work
without ND clause?
Course there is. The text of the CC licenses, for example, is under CC0;
Creative Commons is trademarked and that trademark is used to
Congratulations Astrid!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Many congratulations, Astrid and WMNO!
Wishing you all many more successes.
Best,
Vishnu
On 02/23/2015 10:10 PM, Katy Love wrote:
Congratulations, Astrid and Wikimedia Norge!
Astrid, you have
Thanks Fæ, those reports are very interesting from my perspective.
However, even though the number of thanks received may be more reliable
than the usual edit count, none of them could ever measure the
invaluable impact of our contributors :-)
Il 23/02/2015 16:57, Fæ ha scritto:
Congratulations and all the best!
2015-02-25 0:32 GMT-06:00 Edward Galvez egal...@wikimedia.org:
Congratulations Astrid!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Many congratulations, Astrid and WMNO!
Wishing you all many more successes.
Best,
Vishnu
Il 02/01/2015 13:41, Ricordisamoa ha scritto:
Il 02/01/2015 12:45, Andy Mabbett ha scritto:
On 2 January 2015 at 10:46, Ricordisamoa
ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Honestly, I don't think it is easier to type {{subst:url to diff}} than
[[Special:Diff]].
It's not a matter of which is
The Affiliations Committee (AffCom) will be releasing more details about
the changes to the Wikimedia User Group (WUG) Renewal Process, but I did
want to share some info in this conversation that has already been posted
on Meta[1] and will be discussed more in an upcoming blog post.
In this
Hello, how are you guys?
Cornelius Kibelka send me the link of this thread, by mistake, in one
discussion on Meta.[1]
And the Carlos Colina's answer is, lets say, wow! It's super freak
weird!!!, because in the WMBR mailing list, one volunteer asked who send
the request and one of the proposal's
24.02.2015, 18:25, Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com:
I moderated Nemo when, after protesting the fact that Odder was still
moderated (more on that later), he started forwarding messages for
him. Before I had any chance to clear the matter up, he sent that
message and quit in a huff.
I was
22 matches
Mail list logo
