Hi Pascal, all,
this is being discussed here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cyberpower678 THe last response was
June 16, and it seems to focus on geo-blocking as the cause for
blacklisting (in case anyone feels called to help out the developer).
This bot performs incredible work and I h
I recognise and again apologise for confusing the actions of two different
Board members that represent the "community".
I have directly contacted Nataliia and apologised in person, and offered to
do what she requests to make amends for the statement.I had no
intention to participate in this a
I tend to agree with Nathan here. I don't know the history of the event
described, so I'm not sure whether or not it would be fair to bring up even
if it had been Natalia. But certainly, publicly identifying the incorrect
person in an accusation is no small thing.
Gnangarra, you have given yoursel
Considering the context, Gnangarra, I think you owe something a little more
substantial. In the midst of tearing Nat down for misdeeds which you
yourself acknowledge she didn't personally commit (that of Board
miscommunication), and considering your opposition is based on Board
directives that she
Thanks, I appreciate the work you do.
On Jun 23, 2020, at 3:03 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Just a handful of further responses on the racism thread.
>
> Specifically in case anyone wonders, no messages regarding the branding
> project were suppressed.
>
> A.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 00:5
Just a handful of further responses on the racism thread.
Specifically in case anyone wonders, no messages regarding the branding
project were suppressed.
A.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 00:54 Benjamin Ikuta wrote:
>
>
> For the sake of transparency, how many messages were blocked?
>
>
>
> On Jun
For the sake of transparency, how many messages were blocked?
On Jun 23, 2020, at 2:31 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Dear Wikimedians,
>
> We have ended the emergency moderation of the mailing list
>
> We did our best to process the moderation queue at least several times a
> day, but are happ
I second Jan-Bart; thanks to Nat for this letter. As someone who asked for
a board statement, I appreciate this very much. And as someone who has also
been on the other side, like Jan-Bart I am aware of how much work a
statement like this likely took (and how difficult it is to balance many
perspec
Dear Asaf,
Thanks for this update. I trust the judgement of the list moderators.
Regards
Isaac
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, 22:32 Asaf Bartov, wrote:
> Dear Wikimedians,
>
> We have ended the emergency moderation of the mailing list
>
> We did our best to process the moderation queue at least several
Dear Wikimedians,
We have ended the emergency moderation of the mailing list
We did our best to process the moderation queue at least several times a
day, but are happy to return the list to regular operation.
Asaf
in behalf of the list admins
Brad: this was brilliant, thank you.
I have been thinking about how to phrase this all week, and you touched it
with a needle.
The Foundation's one undelegable role is to protect the community identity
through its marks.
That is a foundation upon which all else rests.
There are many ways we can
Thank you, Nataliia, for stepping forward and clearing out some of the
confusion. That helps.
But not all the confusion gets cleared for me regarding the survey process.
For example, X marks Option 1 as 'Disagree' and Option 2 as 'Strongly
Disagree'. The score points for 'Disagree' is -1 and 'Stro
Dear Wikimedians,
On June 6-8, 2020 Wikimedia Armenia’s snap Assembly was held online, the
agenda of which was the adoption of the new charter, the election of the
Board members, and the Supervisory Committee. All this was done within the
framework of the organization's reforms.
The majority of
And there never was any insult or anything close to that, just a
misunderstanding, which I believe was clarified.
A terça, 23 de jun de 2020, 08:56, revi escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> > 2020. 6. 23. 14:13, Gnangarra 작성:
> >
> > Nat insulted an ESEAP
> > affiliate because she wanted a European affiliate t
Juhar everyone,
In case you have missed the agenda for the Education office hours, you can
bring any topic for discussion and share your work (mostly related to use
of Wikimedia projects in education). This time we will be joined by the
Reading Wikipedia [1] research fellows, know about the projec
HI,
My native language is French, automatic translation into English.
This message follows the numerous detection of false 404 links by the Internet
Archive robot because it is blacklisted on a lot of servers. Small details
concerning the archiving service of Wikiwix (
https://nl.wikipedia.org/
My apologies for that error
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:56, revi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 2020. 6. 23. 14:13, Gnangarra 작성:
> >
> > Nat insulted an ESEAP
> > affiliate because she wanted a European affiliate to endorse her
> > nomination.
>
> Fact check: that was Shani Evanstein.
>
>
> https://meta.wik
That one first, and second that it does not even matter. We should
appreciate that Nat came up with this statement, which is written in her
name, not even as a Board resolution, perfectly knowing that it would not
be fully accepted by the active part of the community, and she woull be a
target of a
Hi,
> 2020. 6. 23. 14:13, Gnangarra 작성:
>
> Nat insulted an ESEAP
> affiliate because she wanted a European affiliate to endorse her
> nomination.
Fact check: that was Shani Evanstein.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Affiliate-selected_Board_seats/2019/Nominations/Shani_Evenstein
19 matches
Mail list logo
