Hi Fabrice:
Best wishes. Hope we can meet again through Flickr.
Jee
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Ad Huikeshoven a...@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Hi Fabrice,
You will be missed in the movement. Your approach was inspirational to
many. I've met you first at Wikimania Hong Kong where you took
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Eduardo Testart etest...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking, it is possible to create some sort of hall of fame
from/for
Wikipedia? It would be nice that stories like this one
My deep condolences.
Jee
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) vp2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Wikimedians all over the world,
One of our stalwarts at ml Wikimedia community, Wikiuser:BabuG
https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Babug (
https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Babug)
Glad to see me there. :)
Regards,
Jee
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk
wrote:
Who was most thanked?
On 5 February 2015 at 15:47, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After reading an interesting related discussion on GenderGap, I have
queried
An there is much stress for our volunteer (unpaid) job too. I definitely
need to slow down:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Request_to_confirm_release_from_the_artist.2C_rather_than_the_gallery_-_Joep_van_Liefland
Regards,
Jee
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Michael
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Well - regarding permission-commons ques the current problem with mass
upload agreements is Common's regulation that ticket-templates has to be
added by OTRS volunteers themselves, except, when you are using GLAM tool,
We have a 57 days backlog now (
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/backlog) and we are
processing first-come, first-served. In case of emergencies, please make a
note at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard or on
my talk page.
Regards,
Jee
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015
I don't think Commons has a clear stand in this matter. I see many old DRs
closed as kept.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Beer_bottles
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bottle_of_Duff.jpg
Regards,
Jee
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:14
I tried to make the PDF of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6_Twin_Otter
It credits File:WinAir De Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 Twin Otter
Breidenstein.jpg Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:WinAir_De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6-300_Twin_Otter_Breidenstein.jpg
Thanks Mark for pointing me to the new PDF exporter; hope it will improve
the accuracy of data gathering from file pages.
BTW, I improved the file page [1], and now contributor is attributing
properly [2]. But it still failed to fetch the license. So my understanding
is that the current script is
I don't know, it seems to me that deploying new software ASAP before it has
been exhaustively tested by the end user base has caused a few headaches
lately ;-).
Cheers,
Craig
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
I agree with Erik here. Media Viewer may have some bugs that need to be
fixed. But there are plenty of issues in other places too (like license
tags). They also need to improved. See this ongoing discussion. [1]
See my comment on RfC on Commons. [2]
Jee
Links:
1.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't, however, help the concern that millions of users are
pulling
up the images without immediately seeing the license requirements and
dummy tests to verify if it is possible from such an angle. Tired
by the arguments, Legal released [1].
Links:
1.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Authorship_and_Copyright_Ownership
Jee
Regards,
Jeevan Jose
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Pipo Le Clown plecl...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Peter Southwood
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Indeed, and as there is a notice on the Wikilegal article stating that it
is not legal advice, it can and will be ignored by those who think they
know better.
Cheers,
Peter
That message on their every
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I *did* want, and am still waiting for, is some explanation from Erik
Möller, the WMF's Deputy Director, about his inflammatory claim that the
Wikimedia Commons community may be turning into a CLUB OF ZEALOTS
Hi Erik:
Thanks for your comment. I noticed your comment at [[1]] so hope they are
related.
Yes; making proper attributions and satisfying all license requirements are
a bit complicated and time consuming. See my proposal at [[2]].
I requested the help of CC team; but didn't get any response so
I think following the opinion of Carl Lindberg is the best option [1]: I
would personally be happy about not having to delete governmental works
which have expired in their own country... those always have felt different
to me than privately-held copyrights.
Hope Fae will support me when I start
https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A5:%D7%AA%D7%92%D7%95%D7%91%D7%AA_%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%93_%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%98%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%A2%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9F_%D7%96%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%99%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D.jpg
Such a statement from GOI
All ended in a good way as Sven Manguard unblocked her. Hope the Hebrew
Wikipedia will recover from the painful memories soon.
Regards,
Jee
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
Suite of the drama.
A request for a topic ban against LGA, who made these
Accidentally, I have one of these FFD nomination pages on my watchlist.
Yesterday it was renominated for the THIRD time by the same user (the
second one was keep as well). And I can not act on it anymore. Apparently,
at some point the user will get an admin with a stricter interpretation of
the
BTW, why we have separate policies for Commons and Wikipedia? I just
noticed that photographs deleted from Common per not free in source
country are restored by our own (Commons) admins in English Wikipedia.
Jee
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:18 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2014
. Specific country
specific implementations may exactly allow for things people are not aware
off. Yes the INTENTION is for them to be the same.
As to why things go wrong? They do.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 June 2014 04:51, Jeevan Jose jkadav...@gmail.com wrote:
CC does NOT say anything
In many recent discussions in Wikimedia Commons, I noticed that many of our
media contributors are not well aware of the terms of licenses they grant.
Main confusions are in three areas:
1. Attribution: Many people think we can demand attribution near the work
used in off wiki cases. But according
...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jeevan Jose, 05/06/2014 07:59:
So do we have a responsibility to
educate the contributors than misusing their ignorance in such cases?
The three points you raise are legally untested in most countries and even
CC's FAQ is not legal advice. For us, point 1 is covered
to Commons is a risky business?
Regards,
Jee
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Jeevan Jose jkadav...@gmail.com wrote:
For us, point 1 is covered by ToU - Nemo
But my understanding is Tou (7 g) is only applicable for Wikimedian who
contribute their own works. We have so many third party uploads
the content deleted, end
of story.
Regards,
Jee
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jeevan Jose, 05/06/2014 14:04:
So uploading third party images to Commons is a risky business?
IANAL, but: not under DMCA unless a zealous attorney uses the new
Wikipedia discourages self diagnosis and treatment:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Medical_disclaimer
And I think professionals are capable enough to verify the credibility of
the referred sources instead of blindly reading the articles.
Regards,
Jee
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:31 PM,
Thanks all for your opinions, suggestions and advice. I was away due to a
personal emergency; just back home today. I read all the responses above,
including Pierre-selim's advise on how to handle such cases in future. I
agree, and my intention was not to ignore in Commons discussions and make a
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Odderoldid=124445321#Commons_talk:Nudity
Is this the way Commons:Photographs of identifiable people works?
Regards,
Jee
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Founder of the Wikimedia Foundation = One who founded/established the
foundation? Sorry; I didn't get your question.
Regards,
Jee
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the assurance that the community directly and indirectly
influences 100% of the board.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_151#Resolution:Media_about_living_people
Hope this helps.
Jee
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net
wrote:
While I appreciate the lengthy discussion about the scope of the
resolution and about
Is there a discussion happening on Commons somewhere about the
implications of this resolution? - John Vandenberg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Resolution:Media_about_living_people
Jee
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:24 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat,
And an application at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Contact_us/Problems#Suggested_change
Jee
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Jeevan Jose jkadav...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a discussion happening on Commons somewhere about the
implications of this resolution? - John
I would like to know where subjects can post their complaint besides on
the talk page, since putting complaints there is still a form of
publication and only serves to propagate the sensitive information that
subjects want removed. - Jane Darnell
Yes; we are working on it. See
35 matches
Mail list logo
