Kevin Gorman wrote:
Regarding the IA: they have a significant interest in working with the
Wikimedia projects, a lot more experience than the Wikimedia projects have
caching absolutely tremendous quantities of data, a willinness to handle a
degree of legal risk that would be inappropriate for
IA's legality in general has apparently never been tested in court,
A bit too generic a statement; I assume you're talking only of the
legality of giving public access to Wayback copyright-eligible all
rights reserved content.
IA follows a standard which is designed to avoid litigation:
James, I think you may have missed the part of my message about and are
willing to work with us to address concerns we may have about their
existing services :)
In any case, given that the IA in general is way more eager to test the
boundaries of copyright law and given that they (through
