gt; on the talk page of the WG.
>>>> I am glad that further thought is being given to the time commitment to
>>>> the WGs. I hope to discuss this further with you, perhaps in a Hangouts
>>>> meeting next week.
>>>> Thank you for your responsiveness
that further thought is being given to the time commitment to
>>>> the WGs. I hope to discuss this further with you, perhaps in a Hangouts
>>>> meeting next week.
>>>> Thank you for your responsiveness to input.
>>>> Pine
>>>> ( https://meta.wi
>>> on the talk page of the WG.
>>> I am glad that further thought is being given to the time commitment to
>>> the WGs. I hope to discuss this further with you, perhaps in a Hangouts
>>> meeting next week.
>>> Thank you for your responsiveness to i
ts
>> meeting next week.
>> Thank you for your responsiveness to input.
>> Pine
>> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>>
>> Original message From: Kaarel Vaidla <
>> kvai...@wikimedia.org> Date: 6/18/18 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00) T
m: Kaarel Vaidla <
> kvai...@wikimedia.org> Date: 6/18/18 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
> wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Movement
> Strategy: Open Call for Working Group
> members
> Dear Pine,
>
> Product & Technology are closely int
week.
Thank you for your responsiveness to input.
Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
Original message From: Kaarel Vaidla
Date: 6/18/18 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00) To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Movement Strategy: Open Call for Working
Dear Pine,
Product & Technology are closely interrelated themes. We do not have a
product without technology and technology is developed according to our
product vision & design. The Working Group will not duplicate the
discussions, but ensure that different existing processes feed into each
While that's a good step to see, I think that an average of five hours per
week for nine months is still a lot to ask, and is not something that I'm
likely to recommend to most people.
However, I have the impression that WMF is trying to involve the community
in this in a significant way, and I
I don't like to steal Kaarel's thunder here, but he actually changed the
number of hours from minimum 5 per week to average 5 per week (which is a
significant improvement):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups=10598095=18129628=18125168
Hi Kaarel,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Kaarel Vaidla
wrote:
> Dear Pine and Lodewijk,
>
> Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feedback. I would like to comment
> on some of your concerns in my role as the Process Architect.
>
> The scope for all groups has been defined in quite a
e: 2018-06-13 14:57 GMT-07:00
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Movement Strategy: Open Call for Working Group
> members
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
>
>
> The number of hours (a minimum of 5 hours, each week) is indeed very
> significant - especially as a minimum per week (which mea
The number of hours (a minimum of 5 hours, each week) is indeed very
significant - especially as a minimum per week (which means that the
average will more likely end up around 8-12 hours?). I understand that a
significant commitment is necessary (an average of 1 as suggested by Pine
will unlikely
Hi Nicole,
Generally I like how the groups are organized. I have a few questions and
comments.
1. The Product & Technology working group seems like it has a large scope
for a single group. Also, the people who are in that working group will
probably want to sync with TechCom and with the
Dear Wikimedians,
Following up on Katherine’s email from last week[1], we are today
opening the call for Working Group members for 9 Thematic Areas (yes,
we added one more!).
== Working Group members ==
The Working Groups will map the present situation of their Thematic
Area, the obstacles and
14 matches
Mail list logo
