Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-12 Thread Gnangarra
I would be careful but using the Wikimania to forward some phases of the discussion in person because many people dont get the opportunity to attend in person and the last thing this process needs now is another barrier to community participation On 13 October 2015 at 00:55, Siko Bouterse wrote:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-12 Thread Siko Bouterse
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Liang-chih Shang Kuan < shangkua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to kindly ask a follow up on the issue Isabella Apriana has > mentioned - "...it's not official yet for Montreal, but seems like > there's nothing we can do about 2017 now because community

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-10 Thread Liang-chih Shang Kuan
Hi all, I want to kindly ask a follow up on the issue Isabella Apriana has mentioned - "...it's not official yet for Montreal, but seems like there's nothing we can do about 2017 now because community discussion is expected to focus on 2018-2021." Is that true? Should all the bid team except Mont

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-08 Thread Isabella Apriyana
Hello, We already knew about Montreal (and the hint for cruise ship) [1] before putting Bali on Meta. Nevertheless, we did so and moved on to contact and meet with vendors, venues, etc; simply because it's an active meta page for Wikimania 2017 bids, there's a somewhat obvious bidding timeline and

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-06 Thread Pete Forsyth
Gnangarra, you're attaching a great deal of significance to a small detail in a complex situation. But please do look at the broader picture: - The chair of the Wikimania Committee has acknowledged that the Montreal selection is not confirmed.[1] - The supervisor of the committee's WMF re

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-06 Thread Gnangarra
interesting suggestions Pete but the published timeline is based on the published process which has now been marked as obsolete/historical. We also know none of that process had been followed nor was there any intention to follow that process. Are you seriously suggesting people continue to put tim

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-06 Thread Pete Forsyth
All: Based on a number of the posts in this thread, I think a few points are worth underscoring. 1. The Wikimania Jury (historical -- and for what it's worth, I was a member) and Wikimania Committee (present) have never had a strong mandate. Its recommendations have generally been accept

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-05 Thread Carlos M. Colina
Hi Siko El 06/10/2015 a las 01:11 a.m., Siko Bouterse escribió: Hi folks, Just letting you know that I’m reading the recent Wikimania-focused mailing list threads with interest, as the Community Resources team is now on-point for funding and coordinating WMF’s involvement in Wikimania. A coupl

[Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on carrying the Wikimania conversation forward

2015-10-05 Thread Siko Bouterse
Hi folks, Just letting you know that I’m reading the recent Wikimania-focused mailing list threads with interest, as the Community Resources team is now on-point for funding and coordinating WMF’s involvement in Wikimania. A couple of first thoughts to share: 1. WMF has learned from past Wikiman