en:wp has a vast collective of policies, guidelines and essays to navigate.
Where once we had a philosophy "if the rule get in the way of making an
enncyclopedia ignore the rules" now with so much of what we do the rules
have become absolute. Acknwoledging BLLP, COI, and copyright need to be
Hi John,
I agree that millions of people choose to spend time on Facebook, as well
as games and other recreational activities like computer games. My guess is
that, for most people, these activities often don't feel like work, while
contributing to Wikimedia often feels like work. I think that
Hoi,
Yes, there are many rules. Yes, they have arisen because of the need felt
by some. It is totally obvious that these rules are created with the "best
intentions". Given the state of play these rules are not analysed for their
effect particularly not for their side effects.
The rules and the
I wonder if some of the problem is that we have made a mash-up of policies
and guidelines on the same pages, thereby making it very hard for newcomers
to figure out what they must know and all the stuff that is simply nice to
know. Take a look at Verifiability at enwiki. [1] How much of this is
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:42:32 +0800
> > From: Zubin JAIN <jain16...@gapps.uwcsea.edu.sg>
> > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Time to simplify the Bureaucracy ?
> > Message-ID:
> >
Fair comment
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Pine W
Sent: 11 March 2018 06:56
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Time to simplify the Bureaucracy ?
Hi Zubin,
I'd like to respond
Hi Zubin,
I'd like to respond to this in multiple ways.
1. Yes, there are lots of rules and guidelines with varying degrees of
clarity and authority. This seems to me to be an understandable outcome of
a bottom-up process for developing many of Wikipedia's rules and
guidelines. I think that many
Hi Zubin,
> As a rare newcomer to the Wikimedia project, I've been thinking of some of
> the factors that seem to discourage me from contributing and one of the
> primary ones seem to be the fact that the way the administration is
> organized and rules enforced is often vague and unclear. The
hi Zubin,
thanks for being a newcomer to Wikimedia, and also for your interest in the
issue of bureaucracy. I think you're right that it is something worth
analyzing. A chapter of my "Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia"
(2014, Stanford University Press) was dedicated to studying the
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:16 AM, WereSpielChequers <
werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The discussions about declining editor levels started to go quiet in mid
> 2015 after we noticed that numbers had started to rally at the end of 2014.
>
The numbers for English Wikipedia, you mean. For the
ly helps when you are changing something to
understand the different perspectives that lead to that compromise.
WereSpielChequers
--
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:42:32 +0800
From: Zubin JAIN <jain16...@gapps.uwcsea.edu.sg>
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimed
; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 21:42:32 +0800
> From: Zubin JAIN <jain16...@gapps.uwcsea.edu.sg>
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Time to simplify the Bureaucracy ?
> Message-ID:
>
Hi Zubin,
not that I know of.
Cheers
Yaroslav
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Zubin JAIN
wrote:
> Hello,
> As a rare newcomer to the Wikimedia project, I've been thinking of some of
> the factors that seem to discourage me from contributing and one of the
>
Hello,
As a rare newcomer to the Wikimedia project, I've been thinking of some of
the factors that seem to discourage me from contributing and one of the
primary ones seem to be the fact that the way the administration is
organized and rules enforced is often vague and unclear. The definition and
14 matches
Mail list logo