On Aug 21, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:19 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 August 2012 19:44, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Utilitarian work = uncopyrightable
Only under a fairly limited number of legal systems.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I really doubt non-artistic works are copyrighted as a general rule anywhere
I'm not sure what you mean by non-artistic, but if you mean purely
utilitarian, as that term is interpreted by the court, then this is a
good point.
I was
On 22 August 2012 14:14, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:19 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 August 2012 19:44, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Utilitarian work = uncopyrightable
Only
On 21 August 2012 19:44, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
In most cases ( Covering the significant majority of all x-rays existing, but
not ruling out the possibility of rare uses of X-ray photography as an
artistic medium) . . .
7 None of the above
Utilitarian work = uncopyrightable
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:37 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of the US we can consider the constitutional basis of
copyright To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by
securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive
Right to their respective Writings
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Upperarm.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arm.agr.jpg would probably be a
better example.
There's a good chance that wouldn't be considered copyrightable under US law.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Upperarm.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arm.agr.jpg would probably be a
better example.
On 22 August 2012 20:50, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
It possibly has a very thin copyright.
Copyright doesn't have thickness. Either it is copyrightable or it isn't.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Upperarm.jpg
