Hoi Steven,
When the facts show that having the CAPTCHA is a demonstrable BAD idea. It
should be easy to prevent CAPTCHA from being implemented again.
I am sure you know who to speak to.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 July 2013 21:02, Steven Walling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Denny
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi Steven,
>
> When the facts show that having the CAPTCHA is a demonstrable BAD idea. It
> should be easy to prevent CAPTCHA from being implemented again.
>
To be precise, the facts do not show that. They show the CAPTCHA is
responsible
Asaf Bartov, 06/07/2013 23:51:
To be precise, the facts do not show that. They show the CAPTCHA is
responsible for significantly fewer good-faith contributions from casual
editors. That is is or is not a "bad idea", however, is a subjective
judgment, based on one's weighing of multiple factors.
On 1 July 2013 21:26, geni wrote:
> Hmm are we going to need to include a dislaimer with regards to some of the
> captions? Eg:
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scalp_dance,_Blackfoot_Indians_%28HS85-10-18743%29_original.tif
I went with using the "original caption" tag on all uploads.
That's been a very complex issue. Henrique will bring more context into
here.
For now, it's worth mentioning the Portuguese Wikipedia community has been
working on this antivandalism project
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia_Discuss%C3%A3o:Projetos/AntiVandalismoin
order to build alterna
