On Aug 21, 2013 8:56 AM, "Peter Gervai" wrote:
>
> I am possibly failing to see the point of this part of the discussion.
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:14 AM, FT2 wrote:
>
> >- *If the IP is "sufficiently clearly connected" to the individual
> >behind the Alice account*,
>
> It is not an
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2013 8:56 AM, "Peter Gervai" wrote:
> The account and/or underlying IP is
> blocked. That is the technical impediment. The action that is now a federal
> offense, it seems, is to defy the warning, by circumventing the block by
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
> wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 2013 8:56 AM, "Peter Gervai" wrote:
>
> > The account and/or underlying IP is
> > blocked. That is the technical impediment. The action that is now a
> federal
> > o
First of all, I'm sorry If my tone was not appropriate (keep in mind I'm
not a native speaker).
2013/8/21 Terry Chay
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:39 AM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
>
> > Just a question: Why imposing HTTPS ? Really, it will be damaging
>
> The reason why is outlined in Ryan's blog post as w
Hi,
I do not really enjoy the way the mandatory-for-editors HTTPS was
introduced, mainly for time frame and communications (still) reasons,
although I’m globally really enthousiastic about a better security and
particularly the activation of HTTPS. Generally speaking I do _hope_ in
the future WM
On 21 August 2013 07:49, Terry Chay wrote:
...
> Luckily, the standard for the Movement is consensus, not catering to every
> extremist view with 100% buy-in.
As a Commons user responsible for over 2.5 million edits, I would hope
that the WMF do not label or quickly dismiss me as an "extremist"
Fae, 21/08/2013 16:08:
On 21 August 2013 07:49, Terry Chay wrote:
...
Luckily, the standard for the Movement is consensus, not catering to every
extremist view with 100% buy-in.
As a Commons user responsible for over 2.5 million edits, I would hope
that the WMF do not label or quickly dismis
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
> wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2013 8:56 AM, "Peter Gervai" wrote:
>
>> The account and/or underlying IP is
>> blocked. That is the technical impediment. The action that is now a federal
>> offense,
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Peter Gervai wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
>> wrote:
>>> On Aug 21, 2013 8:56 AM, "Peter Gervai" wrote:
>>
>>> The account and/or underlying IP is
>>> blocked. That is the technical impediment. The action that is now a
>>> federal
If you write or add to articles based on journal articles you might
complete this survey:
https://lsucommunications.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_0PTVlA7OUCLqkyV
Fred
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.w
This is a forward from the wikitech-ambassadors list.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/HTTPS is now updated with the new date.
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-ambassadors] Fwd: HTTPS for logged in users delayed.
New date: August 28
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:30:51 -0700
From:
Samuel Klein, 26/07/2013 00:46:
The Berkman Center just came out with a report on the public
discussions surrounding the SOPA-PIPA actions; drawing on the Media
Cloud work by Yochai Benkler and others.
It provides context for the discussions on the English Wikipedia, and
captures the differences
Hi, folks.
Due to some last-minute interest, I've extended the deadline to Aug 27th.
So you are still welcome to join the Wikimedia Foundation's Grant Advisory
Committee, and help review and advise on all grant proposals in the Project
and Event Grants program[1].
Take a look and sign up!
https:
13 matches
Mail list logo
