I took a look at the survey and it is seriously unclear. Is there supposed
to be an explanation which explains what it all means before filling in?
Cheers,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent:
Is there ... an explanation which explains what it all means?
It's an attempted improvement on the policy survey at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy/Survey
A survey about the importance of various policy issues ... given the
highest priority by our community.
If you are having trouble
On 13 March 2014 05:13, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there ... an explanation which explains what it all means?
It's an attempted improvement on the policy survey at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy/Survey
A survey about the importance of various policy issues ...
In addition to Risker's comments, which I agree with 100%, I would further
request that any future survey of users be designed and supervised only by
someone with extensive expertise and experience in the field of survey
methodology. Many previous surveys that have been done by the Foundation
Dear Wikimedians,
Here is the monthly report of Wikimedia Argentina for February 2014.
You can read the full report (in Spanish and English) here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Argentina/Reportes/2014-02
Also, the full reports of past months are available at
Dear Wikimedia contributors, please help spreading this call for Google
Summer of Code candidates in your projects, chapters, and surroundings.
Thank you!
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Quim Gil* q...@wikimedia.org
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014
Subject: URGENT call for
Hello Everyone!
We're sending out another call for new Grant Advisory Committee (GAC)
members!
The GAC are community volunteers who are explicitly invited[1] to review
and evaluate grant proposals made in the Wikimedia Foundation Project and
Event Grants Program[2], and offer advice to both
I would suggest blogging about GsoC and maybe posting about it on the wp
discussion pages. There is only one week left!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Wikimedia contributors, please help spreading this call for Google
Summer of Code candidates in your
I guess we should share on Facebook as well as Twitter. (MediaWiki /
Wikimedia Foundation)
Thanks
Harsh
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:19 AM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest blogging about GsoC and maybe posting about it on the wp
discussion pages. There is only one week
On Thursday, March 13, 2014, Harsh Kothari harshkothari...@gmail.com
wrote:
I guess we should share on Facebook as well as Twitter. (MediaWiki /
Wikimedia Foundation)
Yes, you were faster than me. :)
https://www.facebook.com/MediaWikiProject/posts/264324327074526?stream_ref=5
Hello,
In response to some community comments on the proposed amendment to the
Terms of Use on undisclosed paid edits, the WMF's LCA team has suggested
two optional changes to the scope of the amendment. The aim is to address
concerns regarding reactions against editors who are suspected of
I have shared this with several fellow coders and have asked them to pass
it on.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Harsh Kothari harshkothari...@gmail.comwrote:
I guess we should share on Facebook as well as Twitter. (MediaWiki /
Wikimedia Foundation)
Thanks
Harsh
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at
Hi Craig,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
In addition to Risker's comments, which I agree with 100%, I would further
request that any future survey of users be designed and supervised only by
someone with extensive expertise and experience in
Le lundi 10 mars 2014 21:03:20 (CET), Yuri y...@rawbw.com a écrit :
On 03/10/2014 11:30, Seb35 wrote:
Another point of view is that the knowledge doesn’t (shouldn’t) depend
in any way of the local government -- possibly it can be viewed
differently from a culture to another but that’s a
... list of causes - many of which have little or no correlation with
anything even vaguely related to the operation of the WMF, its core
philosophies, or its purpose
If the Trustees have decided that we should pay advocates, why not
advocate on the issues most likely to increase the
On 13 March 2014 22:38, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
If the Trustees have decided that we should pay advocates,
snip
Link to the board of decision to pay advocates please.
Risker
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Link to the board of decision to pay advocates please.
The most recent seems to be the approval f the Annual Plan as per
On 13 March 2014 23:56, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
Link to the board of decision to pay advocates please.
The most recent seems to be the approval f the Annual Plan as per
Ah. Yeah. The job of the Community Advocacy bit of Legal and Community
Advocacy is, as I understand it, to advocate for the community's need
within the Foundation, and act as a conduit to the community for legal
stuff. Their job is not to advocate for reduction in public school class
sizes or more
19 matches
Mail list logo
