REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Praveena Maharaj
Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:55 AM
Subject: Invitation to WMF August 2015 Metrics & Activities Meeting:
Thursday, September 3, 18:00 UTC
To:
I just want to respond to this point in particular:
"Postponing the Italian fundraising campaign means for the first time in at
least 4 years, the fundraising team will not be meeting a target. The team
will pick up extra work in October to make up for work missed in September.
It's not possible
In general I'm glad to see this project moving forward. I would encourage
the project to interface with the ongoing work in L about toolkits, as
well as the Learning Patterns Library.
Thanks,
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Do you really think they may be acting in bad faith?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Trillium Corsage
Sent: Wednesday, 02 September 2015 10:58 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re:
If WMF decides to completely remove Superprotect and the Board's
forthcoming policy prohibits the reintroduction of Superprotect without
Board authorization, I won't object to that outcome.
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
I'm glad you like it.
What about the project pages made you conclude it's not already interfacing
with L? Have you noticed the Resources sections, in particular?
A.
On Sep 3, 2015 12:21 AM, "Pine W" wrote:
> In general I'm glad to see this project moving forward. I
In my travels in the L workshop pages, I can't recall seeing a reference
from the toolkits to the CCD initiative pages, and I am hoping to see links
from CCD pages to the toolkits as the latter are built out.
I have encouraged L to design toolkits with new or emerging communities
in mind, and my
2015. 9. 3. 오전 6:00에 "Trillium Corsage" 님이 작성:
>
> The Orangemoody network seems to have been providing a service: bring the
apparently self-submitted but failed drafts of articles of persons,
organizations, and businesses up to compliance with Wikipedia standards and
get
Trillium, they were not writing to " bring the apparently self-submitted
but failed drafts of articles of persons, organizations, and businesses up
to compliance with Wikipedia standards ". They were mostly posting the same
rejected article, supplemented sometimes by references that made it look
Response to Peter Southwood's question.
Are the investigators acting in bad faith? Does a mob know it is a mob, or is
it that the people in it have lost the capacity for self-critical and analytic
thought? On the one Orangemoody article I've been able to review so far, Bosch
Sensortec
Hi Pine,
Thanks for bringing this up.
We have actually talked with Asaf and Sati about possible ways in which
the CCD initiative could inform toolkit development, in order to make sure
to keep them relevant, specially for emerging communities. One of the
things we want to do is user testing of
Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-09-02/Special_report
News and notes: Flow placed on ice
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-09-02/News_and_notes
Discussion
12 matches
Mail list logo