[Wikimedia-l] 3,000,000 Wikidata Infoboxes in Commons categories

2020-06-21 Thread Michael Peel
Hi all, We’ve just reached a milestone with the deployment of Wikidata Infoboxes in Wikimedia Commons categories: there are now over 3 million uses! [1] These infoboxes are completely multilingual, and they automatically expand as more information is added to Wikidata. (I think enwp has around

[Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation proposal to call ourselves as the Wikipedia Network, Wikipedia Movement or simply Wiki

2020-06-21 Thread Roman Bustria Jr.
Hi Folks, There is a proposal initiated by the Wikimedia Foundation to call ourselves the "Wikipedia Network", "Wikipedia Movement" or simply "Wiki". I strongly suggest that the Foundation should allocate time & resources with the Wikimedia community fully involved in *identifying and resolving t

[Wikimedia-l] Happy birthday Wikimedia

2020-06-21 Thread Wikimedia Armenia Board
Dear colleagues, On behalf of Wikimedia Armenia, I congratulate all of us on the establishment of the Wikimedia Foundation. It carries out a very important mission in all corners of the world, ensuring such important activities that contribute to free knowledge, content creation, and dissemination

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Brand Project] Rescheduling Naming Convention Proposal community review

2020-06-21 Thread Dan Szymborski
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:58 PM Zack McCune wrote: > Hi GerardM, > > Indeed! > > > As I mentioned in my earlier message, the process will be multilingual. We > want to ensure that as many people as possible from across the movement > have the opportunity to participate, so we are working hard to m

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation proposal to call ourselves as the Wikipedia Network, Wikipedia Movement or simply Wiki

2020-06-21 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Today I wrote a "swot analysis" [1]. What I want us to achieve is an increased effectiveness in our aim to share the sum of all knowledge. What I write is stark. I allow for a situation where Mr Trump remains president. I contrast on the one hand that room for growth (think audience) is not i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] 3, 000, 000 Wikidata Infoboxes in Commons categories

2020-06-21 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:24 PM Michael Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > We’ve just reached a milestone with the deployment of Wikidata Infoboxes in > Wikimedia Commons categories: there are now over 3 million uses! [1] These > infoboxes are completely multilingual, and they automatically expand as mo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Brand Project] Rescheduling Naming Convention Proposal community review

2020-06-21 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, I do not translate but I do care. What I personally do is include data in a structured manner. I do it for things I more or less care about.. It does include awards, educated at, employed by, Ottoman history, Africa, science.. The point in what I do is that much of these structures can be repr

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Happy birthday Wikimedia

2020-06-21 Thread Hamish Shing Shing Chau
Happy birthday WMF! Sincerely, Hamish Hong Kong Special Administrative Region From portable device > On 21 Jun 2020, at 6:23 PM, Wikimedia Armenia Board > wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > On behalf of Wikimedia Armenia, I congratulate all of us on the > establishment of the Wikimedia Found

[Wikimedia-l] Scientific racism

2020-06-21 Thread
In line with Asaf's suggestion that discussion stays on-wiki, there has been initial discussion based on unambiguous example cases of scientific racism at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_Lives_Matter#Scientific_racism As the incidents are on a large number of different non-English Wikip

Re: [Wikimedia-l] 3, 000, 000 Wikidata Infoboxes in Commons categories

2020-06-21 Thread Samuel Klein
Truly wonderful. And the underlying tools have been useful even more widely... thank you for sharing the milestone. On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 6:23 AM Michael Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > We’ve just reached a milestone with the deployment of Wikidata Infoboxes > in Wikimedia Commons categories: there

[Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Nataliia Tymkiv
Dear all, As Acting Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees since March [1] I take full responsibility for this situation. I am truly sorry for all the frustration this whole situation has caused to volunteers, who have engaged in discussions expressing their concerns, and to the staff

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Tito Dutta
Greetings, Thanks for working on this response. I thank you and the board for the care you have shown in this email. The upcoming August meeting is going to be an important one, as I understand from the email. We will look forward to its outcomes. There have been concerns that opinions or voices ha

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
Hi Nat, Thank you very much for managing to put out a statement in a reasonable timeframe, despite the harsh conditions most of all endure now. I can only imagine how hard it has been to get to that. Above all, thank you a lot for the sincerity and for the courage on taking a blame that I'm certai

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread James Salsman
What did the legal department have to say about The Wiki Foundation? Will Ward end up with that one? Does the executive staff and Board have a position on supporting the .ia domain name for the Internet Archive, with the provision that wikiped.ia is assigned to the Foundation in perpetuity? Best

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Rajeeb Dutta
Greetings, Hope my mail finds you in the best of health and spirit. I like to take the opportunity to thank you for a penning a detailed email with clarification. Yes, we all looking forward for a better possible outcome. Stay healthy and be safe. Best Regards, Rajeeb. (U: Marajozkee) (Sent f

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Dan Szymborski
OK, you say that you take "full responsibility" for the situation. What exactly does "full responsibility" entail? How will the relations between the board and the communities differ compared to the moment *before* full responsibility was taken? Is the board changing the degree to which it will co

[Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on the rebranding initiative: "Movement"

2020-06-21 Thread Paul J. Weiss
[From my comments in the rebranding survey] "Movement" Please stop calling us a "movement". I am an active Wikipedia contributor, but I do not feel part of a movement. Know that I feel excluded when we are referred to as a movement. I would guess that most Wikimedians do not consider themselves p

[Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on the rebranding initiative: Wikimedia vs. Wikipedia

2020-06-21 Thread Paul J. Weiss
[From my comments in the rebranding survey] Wikimedia vs. Wikipedia Our overall community centers around the current Wikimedia concept, not Wikipedia. Naming the whole from one its parts is ambiguous, confusing, and disrespectful to non-Wikipedia projects. The majority of the population of the Un

[Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on the rebranding initiative: Name of WMF

2020-06-21 Thread Paul J. Weiss
[From my comments in the rebranding survey] Name of WMF To me a trust implies one party relegating authority over a resource to a second party, who is expected to manage it well, and return it at some point to the first party or a third party. I do not see the WMF's role as including such as a no

[Wikimedia-l] Thoughts on the rebranding initiative:: Other

2020-06-21 Thread Paul J. Weiss
[From my comments in the rebranding survey] Other "We network around our best-known brand to connect the movement together". That feels like marketing-speak. It is unclear what you are trying to communicate. I do not think that contributors of non-WP projects want to "network" around Wikipedia.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board Update on Branding

2020-06-21 Thread Ad Huikeshoven
Thank you Nat. I'm Dutch, and the Dutch are known to be direct, and even I find your extensive statement direct. That was your intent to do. Thanks, I welcome that. I know nearly every other culture would prefer less direct communication. As an employer you have a duty to protect your employees ag