:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ellie Young
Date: Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM
Subject: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2015 Bids to host are in
To: open subscription
This is to let the community know that the deadline for receiving bids to
host Wikimania in 2015 has passed.
There ar
Erik,
As you are in contact with Sandole, can you please ask him to fix the
article in his report to AirLand Battle, as per
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AirLand_Battle&diff=515849256&oldid=510840175--
he has written AirSea Battle, and this is obviously not correct. But I
guess it goe
Thanks Erik for your email which was full of spin, and which will be
discussed later.
But for now, I need to present something that needs clarification from
Timothy.
In reference to
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Timothy_Sandole_-_Belfer_Center_Report.pdf
On Page 2 of his report he stat
Erik Moeller, 21/03/2014 08:37:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Fæ wrote:
Eric, in this thread you are officially speaking for the WMF. Does the
WMF really want to say it is "ethical" to have different
accountability rules for funding organizations that want to use the
Wikimedia brand because
Thanks Erik for this clear and, as far as I can see, rather
comprehensive report
There will always be mistakes done, both from us as individuals and as
organizations.
Critical, though, is that we treat these mistakes with openness and
tranparancies and that we learn from our mistakes
In my
Hi all,
I've just met with Lisa Gruwell and Sara Lasner about it to get more
of a debrief of the situation. For the purpose of clarity, I'm looking
into this on Sue's behalf while she's traveling; she should be able to
look into it next week. As noted previously, this isn't a project I
was previou
Russiavia, thanks for your efforts to make a comprehensive report. It's
certainly worth reading, although I am refraining from personally reaching
major conclusions until after we have heard more details from WMF.
Regarding Timothy Sandole's qualifications for the job, he could have been an
Thanks David, this is really lovely as usual. SJ
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:41 PM, David Parreño Mont - Comunicació
wrote:
> Dear fellows,
>
> The following message is just to keep you informed about the activities
> developed in February by Amical Wikimedia.
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/A
Dear fellows,
The following message is just to keep you informed about the activities
developed in February by Amical Wikimedia.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Amical_Wikimedia/February_2014
Kind regards,
David Parreño Mont
User:Davidpar
Communications, Amical Wikimedia
*Source:* https:
Russavia,
Thank you for compiling this analysis. In particular the credible
sources you have put together should make the Wikimedia Foundation's
review a lot easier. I was particularly interested in the role of WMF
Fundraising in this project.
I look forward to soon being able to compare this wit
After reading Tomasz's (Odder) blog post[1] on the
Wikipedian-in-Residence (WiR) at Harvard in 2012 and in response to
Fae's and Pine's questions to the WMF on this list, I thought I would
post my thoughts/report on this issue, as it touches on a few areas of
which I have both professional (HRM and
On 21 March 2014 08:20, Erik Moeller wrote:
...
> Just after talking about "stomping down with its hobnail boots on
> Wikimedia UK", huh? :-) I'm sorry to have offended your delicate...
I apologise for the "hobnail boots" comment, it was unnecessarily dramatic.
This is a slight tangent, but for
On 21 March 2014 11:31, Nathan wrote:
...
> it seems to have been the Belfer
> Center directing his actions and not the WMF.
If Sandole is a reliable source for his employment during 2012-13,
then we must take into account his recent statement which indicates
that the WMF had some defined respons
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Tomasz W. Kozlowski wrote:
> Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> You tend to add a drama factor of 10x to any discussion I've ever seen
>> you participate in, and it gets tiresome after a while. Give it a
>> rest.
>>
>
> Why are you making this issue unnecessarily personal,
Erik Moeller wrote:
You tend to add a drama factor of 10x to any discussion I've ever seen
you participate in, and it gets tiresome after a while. Give it a
rest.
Why are you making this issue unnecessarily personal, Erik? This isn't
about Fae, you, or even Timothy Sandole -- so give it a res
Thanks Erik, for looking into it constructively. Looking forward to the
report and the learnings from the assessment.
Best regards,
Bence
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Fæ wrote:
>
> > Eric, in this thread you are officially speaking f
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Erik, you are a senior manager within the WMF. If you cannot resist
> offensive schoolboy sarcasm in your responses
Just after talking about "stomping down with its hobnail boots on
Wikimedia UK", huh? :-) I'm sorry to have offended your delicate
sensi
On 21 March 2014 07:37, Erik Moeller wrote:
...
> needed, to fully expose Harvard's evil agenda and the secret workings
> of the reptilian order which most WMF senior staff are part of.
...
Erik, you are a senior manager within the WMF. If you cannot resist
offensive schoolboy sarcasm in your res
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> [3] Contributions welcome, and I hope we can avoid personalizing
> things as I'm sure Timothy worked in good faith and did his best to
> meet the expectations of the project. :)
On this I do agree, that Sandole was used as a tool by Stanton/
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Fæ wrote:
> Eric, in this thread you are officially speaking for the WMF. Does the
> WMF really want to say it is "ethical" to have different
> accountability rules for funding organizations that want to use the
> Wikimedia brand because there are different rules
Jan-Bart de Vreede, 20/03/2014 18:49:
work for the Wikimedia Foundation. Your email (and Fae’s) seems to imply that
they work directly for you, which is of course not the case (because they
really only need one person to be their manager
Nice one, can be reused with profit. Next time someone
21 matches
Mail list logo
