Aha, this is what I get for missing office hours. For the record:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours/Office_hours_2015-09-18
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:34 PM, John Lewis wrote:
> I believe they already filled the position as they hired Karen about a week
> ago (after the announceme
I believe they already filled the position as they hired Karen about a week
ago (after the announcement). ca. Staff and contractors page and IRC office
hour.
John Lewis
On Friday, 25 September 2015, Pine W wrote:
> Speaking of Trust and Safety, is there going to be a back-filled position
> in C
Speaking of Trust and Safety, is there going to be a back-filled position
in CA in light of Philippe's departure and Maggie's promotion?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lis
Hey Fae,
As you know that I'm responsible for the spreadsheet that your bot is copying
to make that spreadsheet (since you're one of the ones who asked me to make the
process more transparent) I would have really appreciated a more private email
before this public one. That said, yes there have
Hi,
I notice that the table on Meta of specially granted project rights
for WMF employees has not been updated since June 2015.[1] Last year
it was being amended at least a couple of times a month.
Is this down to a technical problem or was there no need to change any
employee rights on Wikimedia
Dear all,
The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday,
October 1, 2015, at 6:00 PM UTC (11 AM PDT). The IRC channel is
#wikimedia-office on irc.freenode.net, and the meeting will be broadcast as
a live YouTube stream.
At next month's meeting, we will:
* Welcome recent
Garfield,
I have deeply appreciated your guidance, humility, and humor whenever I
have come to you for advice. You respect for our communities and desire to
support them no matter how crazy the situation has been inspiring. You
could easily create and enforce rigid processes and rules, but instead
Hoi,
Checking against other sources is indeed a different thing. However when
you are able to check against another source, what is the point of the
primary sources tool in the first place for that source?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 24 September 2015 at 20:35, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
>> This is to add MusicBrainz to the primary source tool, not anything else?
>
>
> It's apparently worse than that (which I hadn't realized until I re-read the
> transcript). It sounds like it's just going to generate little warning
> icons for "
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
> Thanks! Is there any more information on the issue with MusicBrainz?
>
> 17:26:27 sjoerddebruin: yes, we went for MusicBrainz first,
> but it turned out to be impractical. you basically have to run their
> software in order to use their dumps
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Garfield Byrd wrote:
> All,
>
> For the last four years, I’ve led the Wikimedia Foundation’s finance,
> administration, and office IT teams.
Four years but I feel like you've been a part of the movement forever!
Thank you for everything. Your contributions include
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> Hey everyone :)
>
> We'll be doing the next Wikidata office hour on September 23rd at
> 17:00 UTC. See
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=17&min=00&sec=0&day=23&month=09&year=2015
> for your timezone. We'll be meet
12 matches
Mail list logo
