Wikipedia is clearly the core global brand.
It also has a prominence in the history of the Web and internetworked
society that Wikidata, whatever its future success, will never match.
Internally, as all have noted, the dilemma is that it is associated with
the focus and policies of one project.
Responses below:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:07 PM Strainu wrote:
>
> I would argue that, on the contrary, for the outside word we were less
> Wikipedia 10 years ago. Around that time there was still hope that
> Wikibooks or Wikinews could still be successful, at least in some
> languages. New
Have I missed something, or this discussion is nowhere to be seen at any of
the Village Pumps of the Portuguese Wikipedia?
Also, is there any point in discussing this onwiki, as it was in Commons by
part of the community[1], if apparently there is not any following by the
people in charge of this
Gregory
It would perhaps be helpful if you were to give a little more detail about
what you expect the committee to do and what you think its workload is
likely to be. Will it meet entirely electronically, or will visits to WMF
headquarters be required, and if so, what expenses will be paid? It
