I've no idea what you mean by " second iteration". I was told by Work Group
members that those are the recommendations that were used as starting
points for the discussions by the Work Groups at Tunis last weekend.
Therefore, all that is most probably outdated stuff by now (it was already
Dear Wikimedians,
Below you can find the report of the Wikimedia Community User Group
Albania:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Albania/2018_Report
You can check our future plans here:
Hi Gerard, (and everyone else)
I’m a newbie here and this is my first email - so Wikihello!
Adding to your point, and SJ’s great list of positive things to do:
Yes, it seems that in-person events are necessary. But has anyone questioned
constructively this assumption and tried to design a
The recommendations from the second iteration are available now:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations
Looking at the formatting with discussion links and so on, I assume
community feedback is still welcome. It would be good to announce this in
Hoi,
For me this is a negative approach, it is all about costs and there is no
consideration of benefits. When you consider a conference with over 100
people, you CANNOT replace it by digital means. You will not have the
conversations made possible by being there in person and getting to meet
