Facebook has updated its "community standards" for its 1.4 billion
users. Much of it is relevant for WM Commons.
"It's a challenge to maintain one set of standards that meets the
needs of a diverse global community," said Monika Bickert, Facebook's
head of global policy management, and Chris
The article cited is a tertiary source (like Wikipedia), and so is "as
astonishingly bad"
The underlying research studies [ref#1], [ref#2] claim
"Researchers found that a relatively small number of editors have a
major influence on the site."
"As editors interact with one another and their
At Wikimedia Commons the country specific consent guidelines at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements
(especially for Asian countries) are quite distorted by some over
enthusiastic members of that project. (See the recent edit warring at
that page)
Now
ven seen Creative Commons itself, on it's official Twitter
> and Facebook accounts, posting CC images against the terms.
>
> James Alexander
> User:Jamesofur [Personal capacity, Staff account: Jalexander-WMF]
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Toby Dollmann <toby.dollm...@gm
> It's certainly possible that this is only 'obvious' to me because of my
> knowledge of outside organizations or law but it doesn't surprise me.
Your reply is not obvious to me. I understand that your employment is
exclusively with WMF and you do not appear to be particularly
qualified (or
Hoi,
> I think one of the key takeaways from this affair is that people should be
> careful about talking the law.
An apt observation
In context of the 'absolute right of (individual) directors to inspect
corporate books and records', did the community director actually ask
to access the
