On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:02 PM Yair Rand wrote:
> I'm going to strongly disagree with this.
>
> People are allowed to have outside interests. Being incidentally
> interested in blockchain tech is not a disqualifying attribute. Having
> worked in large technology companies is not a disqualifying
Crypto + NFTs + {tech startup + disrupt + housing market} sounds like
*just* the kind of person WMF needs on its board!
Luis Bitencourt-Emilio might be a great person, and just who we need on the
Board right now, but the optics seem terrible. Maybe I've been spending too
much time in the wrong
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:26 AM Todd Allen wrote:
> Sorry I couldn't get back to you until now, as I didn't see this.
>
> Both you and Gerard's response share the same deficiency: Lack of detail.
> This is basically marketese "sounds good" speak, but without any detail.
> Sure, that stuff sounds
rather than
> trying to provide 'advanced tools' that are intrinsically biased?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 15/10/21 22:51:21, Guettarda wrote:
> > Hi Mike
> >
> > The questions were selected from this list:
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Cha
Hi Mike
The questions were selected from this list:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass/Statements
People voted and the top ones were chosen. (A few near-duplicates that
ranked at the top were combined by Cornelius, iirc). The raw data
underlying
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Gnangarra wrote:
>
> technology is our tool not our purpose
>
>
This should be printed on a banner and hung on the wall every time the
Board meets.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
I was thinking of ways that farmers might use Wikipedia. Or maybe that a
group of them had gotten together to improve our content in Ag. Or
something. But no such luck...
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:59 AM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
*sigh* I was hoping the farmers had united