Hi Mike

The questions were selected from this list:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass/Statements

People voted and the top ones were chosen. (A few near-duplicates that
ranked at the top were combined by Cornelius, iirc). The raw data
underlying both the Compass and Dusan's tool are here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass/Raw_data

Ian


On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:45 PM Mike Peel <em...@mikepeel.net> wrote:

> Both of these seem like a fantastic way to support your intrinsic biases.
>
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates/Table
> - this supports your language or editor start date bias. Since you are
> limited to ordering by name/username/region/languages/wiki/editor since.
>
>
> https://krehel.sk/Candidates_Drafting_Committee_Movement_Charter_Statements/
> - this seems to support selected question answers (from where?) and
> encourages you to vote based on other people's views that decide on
> their rankings (which aren't publicly available)? (Try ordering by Q2 -
> or looking up where Q6 was posted).
>
> We need better tools to help voters. Neither of these tools do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On 15/10/21 22:32:15, Andrew Lih wrote:
> > To echo Risker, I'd encourage the use of more advanced tools by voters.
> > On meta, I've pointed to the two tools that hopefully help:
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Elections#Tools_for_examining_candidates
> > <
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Elections#Tools_for_examining_candidates
> >
> >
> > The links point to:
> > - A table of all the factual information supplied by the candidates in a
> > wiki table, in which each column is sortable.
> > - A browsable interface to all the compass questions and responses,
> > providing much better candidate comparisons. An issue Adam brought up is
> > that there may not be a good understanding of the variance in the
> > answers of candidates. For that reason, this tool is valuable in showing
> > that the following questions had the most diverse responses and are
> > likely to be the most useful for voters to examine directly.
> >
> > 6 - limit the role of WMF to "keep the servers running"
> > 11 - democratic governance structure
> > 20 - new forms of knowledge representation
> > 24 - regional elections
> > 27 - "counter-voice"
> > 45 - "percentage of movement money" to be allocated
> > 92 - ratification from all
> >
> > I'd encourage voters to experiment with these tools.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:39 AM Risker <risker...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:risker...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Adam, you may find the tool discussed here
> >     <
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates#Candidates_Compass:_One_statement,_all_answers
> >
> >     to be helpful.  It is created by one of the candidates, is based on
> >     the information submitted by candidates for the election compass,
> >     and is quite visual.  (Disclosure: I am also a candidate.)
> >
> >     I'd also suggest that the written answers illustrate the differences
> >     between candidates a little more specifically than the general
> >     five-point compass.  Perhaps, also, part of the reason that there's
> >     some consensus amongst candidates (at least on the surface) is that
> >     they could be representative of a pretty broad consensus throughout
> >     the global community on some points.
> >
> >     Risker/Anne
> >
> >     On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 09:26, Adam Wight <adam.m.wi...@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:adam.m.wi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:02 PM Kaarel Vaidla
> >         <kvai...@wikimedia.org <mailto:kvai...@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
> >
> >             Additionally, we are piloting a so-called “Election Compass
> >             <https://mcdc-election-compass.toolforge.org/>” for this
> >             election. Click yourself through the tool and respond to the
> >             19 statements, and you will see which candidate is closest
> >             to you!
> >
> >
> >         Hi, thank you for facilitating this process and for sharing the
> >         interesting "election compass" experiment.  After trying the
> >         tool, I urge you to take it offline.  Its algorithm is opaque,
> >         and in my opinion very unlikely to give a helpful result.  It's
> >         explicitly meant to influence how we vote, but without us having
> >         done any validation of what it's actually calculating.  If you
> >         want to test this tool, you could position it as an "exit poll",
> >         to compare the tool's results with how each person actually
> >         voted, or you could turn off the "alignment" scoring.
> >
> >         My suspicions started with the fact that I answered "strongly
> >         support" or "support" to almost every question, which suggests
> >         that the axes were not chosen in a way that differentiates
> >         between the candidates.  Instead, it seems like it's going to
> >         amplify tiny differences like "strongly" vs "support"—is this
> true?
> >
> >         Was the tool analyzed with this sort of concern in mind?  Are
> >         there reasons to believe that the "alignment" scores are
> >         meaningful in our scenario?
> >
> >         Kind regards,
> >         Adam Wight
> >         [[mw:User:Adamw]]
> >         Writing in my volunteer capacity.
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >         <mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, guidelines at:
> >         https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >         <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines> and
> >         https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >         <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l>
> >         Public archives at
> >
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/ORUIO7XSLVBBW57GIVPG53LJA3CIBNDG/
> >         <
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/ORUIO7XSLVBBW57GIVPG53LJA3CIBNDG/
> >
> >         To unsubscribe send an email to
> >         wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
> >         <mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >     <mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, guidelines at:
> >     https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >     <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines> and
> >     https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l>
> >     Public archives at
> >
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/KKNSAX5FKNUYRRKIZQJZP4OAURUN2JZ5/
> >     <
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/KKNSAX5FKNUYRRKIZQJZP4OAURUN2JZ5/
> >
> >     To unsubscribe send an email to
> >     wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
> >     <mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Andrew Lih
> > Author of The Wikipedia Revolution
> > US National Archives Citizen Archivist of the Year (2016)
> > Knight Foundation grant recipient - Wikipedia Space (2015)
> > Wikimedia DC - Outreach and GLAM
> > Previously: professor of journalism and communications, American
> > University, Columbia University, USC
> > ---
> > Email: and...@andrewlih.com <mailto:and...@andrewlih.com>
> > WEB: https://muckrack.com/fuzheado <https://muckrack.com/fuzheado>
> > PROJECT: Wikipedia Space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WPSPACE
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WPSPACE>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/PHJ3SYO6B4ILQ4N5YRMNJ6UYLLGGORPX/
> > To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/2L4RG5H6XAQ2YPF3NMS4XZDGKQWJPFTD/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/ZTD7FPP5DRFYOBHID4CXGNJ4BGFKIL2W/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to