Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimediauk-l] Copyfraud by the British Museum

Ok sorry, I could only read the text of the email, I can't open the images from here right now, my bad. JP On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 28 July 2017 at 13:28, Jean-Philippe Béland > wrote: > > > Maybe I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimediauk-l] Copyfraud by the British Museum

On 28 July 2017 at 13:28, Jean-Philippe Béland wrote: > Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not > claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures > of it". Even if an object is in the public domain, the actual

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimediauk-l] Copyfraud by the British Museum

Exposed = exhibited. My French is taking over. JP On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jean-Philippe Béland wrote: > Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not > claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures > of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimediauk-l] Copyfraud by the British Museum

Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures of it". Even if an object is in the public domain, the actual physical object is still their property and they can do whatever they want with it, it

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimediauk-l] Copyfraud by the British Museum

"On 28 July 2017 at 13:02, Fæ wrote: > The Tullie House Museum in Carlisle has a number of objects on loan > from the British Museum,[3] and it appears that it is only those > objects that have any restrictions on photography. I took photographs > of two of these (without any