On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Andrea Zanni wrote:
> I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it would be with
> Wikisource (if we had a metadata management system :-).
> As far as I understood, Wikidata will engage sister projects data in
> 2015 (i'm gonna cry).
Th
I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it would be with
Wikisource (if we had a metadata management system :-).
As far as I understood, Wikidata will engage sister projects data in
2015 (i'm gonna cry).
>>>
>>> This isn't clear yet. It's unlikely to happen before the end o
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:50 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Andrea Zanni
>> wrote:
>>> 2012/4/25 emijrp :
Perhaps it is OK for Wikidata.
>>>
>>> I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it wou
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Andrea Zanni
> wrote:
>> 2012/4/25 emijrp :
>>> Perhaps it is OK for Wikidata.
>>
>> I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it would be with
>> Wikisource (if we had a metadata management system :-)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Andrea Zanni wrote:
> 2012/4/25 emijrp :
>> Perhaps it is OK for Wikidata.
>
> I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it would be with
> Wikisource (if we had a metadata management system :-).
> As far as I understood, Wikidata will engage sister projects da
On 25 Apr 2012, at 19:29, emijrp wrote:
> 2012/4/25 Federico Leva (Nemo)
>
>> Thanks for sharing, I had read about it on the NYT but nothing was said on
>> license.
>> So now the USA have more open bibliographic data than Germany/Europe? :)
>> lobid.org is a very nice initiative, but other cata
2012/4/25 emijrp :
> Perhaps it is OK for Wikidata.
I think it's perfectly OK with Wikidata, and it would be with
Wikisource (if we had a metadata management system :-).
As far as I understood, Wikidata will engage sister projects data in
2015 (i'm gonna cry).
Aubrey
2012/4/25 Federico Leva (Nemo)
> Thanks for sharing, I had read about it on the NYT but nothing was said on
> license.
> So now the USA have more open bibliographic data than Germany/Europe? :)
> lobid.org is a very nice initiative, but other catalog systems have very
> complex interactions betwe
Thanks for sharing, I had read about it on the NYT but nothing was said
on license.
So now the USA have more open bibliographic data than Germany/Europe? :)
lobid.org is a very nice initiative, but other catalog systems have very
complex interactions between hundreds or thousands of entities and
Add ALL at Wikisource!
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, emijrp wrote:
> Very good news for Open Library, and for us too.
>
> 2012/4/24 Samuel Klein
>
> > This is big news -- though still only part of Harvard's full
> > collection of records.
> >
> > Following the British Library's release of 3M
Very good news for Open Library, and for us too.
2012/4/24 Samuel Klein
> This is big news -- though still only part of Harvard's full
> collection of records.
>
> Following the British Library's release of 3M bib records under CC0 18
> months ago:
> http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=
11 matches
Mail list logo
