On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> I assume many have muted or are ignoring the "thankspam" thread, but it has
> changed topic rather meaningfully, and I think it deserves broader
> attention.
I see now why Discourse is a problem...
I wanted to install
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Andrea Zanni
> wrote:
> > Why?
> > As a user, you would just need to login and participate, Discourse is
> like
> > a website. You don't need to install
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Erik Bernhardson
wrote:
> FWIW, there is a docker role in wikimedia puppet and it's already used as
> part of the labs infrastructure. Not sure how well tested it is yet, but
> it's there.
In this case I see a kind of solution:
*
Il 23/01/2016 21:34, Milos Rancic ha scritto:
I am speaking as an admin, not as a user :P
In brief, software is not stable. And it's not just that, but the
developers don't know their software well enough to offer a sensible
installation guide. I wouldn't use such software.
Let's say we can
Well,
Discourse is new but it's growing fast:
http://www.discourse.org/faq/customers/
Plus Mozilla:
https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/
and OKFN:
https://discuss.okfn.org/
I personally think that it could really help new people participate in our
discussions, so it's worth a try.
Aubrey
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Erik Bernhardson
> wrote:
> > FWIW, there is a docker role in wikimedia puppet and it's already used as
> > part of the labs infrastructure. Not sure how well
I assume many have muted or are ignoring the "thankspam" thread, but it has
changed topic rather meaningfully, and I think it deserves broader
attention.
A.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Luis Villa
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:31 AM
Subject: Re:
Hoi,
Discourse is fine when it means that I will still receive my email and can
answer in that way.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 January 2016 at 17:34, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> I assume many have muted or are ignoring the "thankspam" thread, but it has
> changed topic rather