been made.
>>
>> Best,
>> Nicole
>>
>> On 27 October 2017 at 15:59, Peter Southwood
>> <peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Nicole.
>>> That is not the message we are getting from the endorsement page.
>>> Cheers,
>
ia Announcements] Movement Strategy: Endorse
the strategic direction today! #wikimedia2030
Hi all,
By endorsing, people and organizations state that they agree that the direction is the right way
for us as a movement to move forward, and that they commit to participate in phase 2 co
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf
> Of Nicole Ebber
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 10:50 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Movement Strategy:
: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Movement Strategy: Endorse
the strategic direction today! #wikimedia2030
Hi all,
By endorsing, people and organizations state that they agree that the direction
is the right way for us as a movement to move forward, and that they commit to
participate
List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Movement Strategy: Endorse
the strategic direction today! #wikimedia2030
I'm not sure how I missed that strongarm-statement ("the endorsement is also a
necessary step in order to participate in phase 2 discussions"). I'm
Well, it might be clear in your mind Yaroslav, but Fæ point is that is
not clear at all in the answer of Nicole. So she might seize the
question to make it perfectly clear or just let it in a fuzzy state
which would give more credit to your point of view.
Thus said, while I do share concerns
I think the situation is pretty clear, and we have already many statements
exactly about this point. The dissenters are being, and will continue being
simply ignored.
Cheers
Yaroslav
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Sorry Nicole, what you have written is
Sorry Nicole, what you have written is ambiguous. Will all affiliates and
individual volunteers be able to be full participants in later discussion
on the strategy, to exactly the same level as those that endorsed phase
one?
Saying that nobody gets "banned" does not ensure an open process. I.e.
Hi all,
By endorsing, people and organizations state that they agree that the
direction is the right way for us as a movement to move forward, and
that they commit to participate in phase 2 conversations in good
faith. And in phase 2, we will discuss how to fill this direction with
life. The next
I'm not sure how I missed that strongarm-statement ("the endorsement is
also a necessary step in order to participate in phase 2 discussions"). I'm
confident that this is a typo of a kind. It does not match with how I know
the people in charge of this process.
Lodewijk
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at
On 26 Oct 2017 09:00, "Nicole Ebber" wrote:
Dear Wikimedians,
Today marks the final milestone of phase 1 of our movement strategy
process. Over the past eight months, many of you, of your peers,
colleagues, partners and friends have contributed to an endeavor that
Dear Wikimedians,
Today marks the final milestone of phase 1 of our movement strategy
process. Over the past eight months, many of you, of your peers,
colleagues, partners and friends have contributed to an endeavor that
resulted in the new Strategic Direction of the Wikimedia movement.
This
12 matches
Mail list logo