Re: [Wikimedia-l] FW: To revdel (RD1) or not to revdel. That is a question....

2014-09-23 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Googledegook, whatshallweexect they know ... UB40.. Thanks, GerardM On 22 September 2014 23:42, Jonatan Svensson Glad wrote: > > > From: gladjona...@outlook.com > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: To revdel (RD1) or not to revdel. That is a question > Date: Mon, 22 Sep

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FW: To revdel (RD1) or not to revdel. That is a question....

2014-09-22 Thread Maggie Dennis
Speaking as volunteer Moonriddengirl and not at all from my work position - according to my understanding, attribution can be supplied by a list of usernames. Per our Terms of Use:[1] 1. *Attribution:* Attribution is an important part of these licenses. We consider it giving credit where cr

[Wikimedia-l] FW: To revdel (RD1) or not to revdel. That is a question....

2014-09-22 Thread Jonatan Svensson Glad
From: gladjona...@outlook.com To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: To revdel (RD1) or not to revdel. That is a question Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:38:16 +0200 I have had some discussions w/ users on IRC about the need to revdel/legal obligation to revdel copyvios. If it had copyvi