Re: [Wikimedia-l] Generated texts

2014-02-07 Thread Magnus Manske
Hi Andy, that message comes up when the JavaScript is broken. I just tried the Bach link, and it works fine for me. Probably a stale browser cache; force-reloading the page should help. Cheers, Magnus On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > Your link has "gone very wrong". I woul

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Generated texts

2014-02-07 Thread Andy Mabbett
Your link has "gone very wrong". I would wait the suggested half hour before telling you this, but by then I hope to be asleep. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk On Feb 7, 2014 4:42 PM, "Gerard Meijssen" wrote: > Hoi, > > We have often had discussions about generating t

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Generated texts

2014-02-07 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, There are two parts to your question. - When is the available data good enough - When is the script that does the text generation good enough The second is something that you can help with. When it is good enough for one item that is really well developed like JS Bach, it is good enoug

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Generated texts

2014-02-07 Thread Strainu
Hi Gerard, The problem that I have with Wikidata and automatically generated content like the reasonator does is: how do you know when has the script and the data reached an acceptable level? I've tested Reasonator a little with Romanian vilages and found errors in both the Wikidata fields and in

[Wikimedia-l] Generated texts

2014-02-07 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, We have often had discussions about generating texts to be used in Wikipedia articles. The drawback of articles that are generated in this way is that they do not get updated as more information becomes available. The data in Wikidata is comparable with the kind of data often used in such pr