what Josh Lim wrote in the other threat:
Hi Jens,
In the absence of any meaningful alternative, what should we do then?
Close down Wikipedia Zero and let the developing world languish in the
dark? We talk of a "more sustainable way to bring free knowledge (which is
far more than Wikipedia)”, yet
Dear Nathan et al.
I answered Josh in the other threat but will copy my answer to him again
here below so that anybody interested to continue can do this in the
"right" threat.
Nathan, I am disgusted by your comparisons. "colonialist aspect"? "little
reminiscent of European Christian missionaries
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Gilles Dubuc wrote:
> To me Josh's point in the other thread settles this argument. I can't
> presume to know better than the people this service is made for what is
> good for them. People in other cultures have values as well. They might be
> different than ours,
To me Josh's point in the other thread settles this argument. I can't
presume to know better than the people this service is made for what is
good for them. People in other cultures have values as well. They might be
different than ours, but more importantly, they have to be pitted against
constrai
Hi Nathan and everybody,
Last time I checked my mail (containing my repsonse to Gerard) wasn't
published and as I sent it yesterday morning I'm suprised that it took that
long to "arrive".
Also, I would like you to stop your wrong assumptions about "off-topic" -
As Gerard made a statement to Wiki
On 15-04-01 01:06 PM, Jens Best wrote:
> I will take the time to explain you why [I believe] net neutrality
> is more than you suggest and why [I think] we need to be a
> little bit less starry-eyed [than I believe we are] when
> it comes to the reasons why telecoms are behaving sooo nice
> to Wiki
Jens - your reply to Gerard on the other thread (where it is surely off
topic) was published a couple of hours ago.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Jens Best wrote:
> Dear James,
>
> your praising of WP0 surely deserves or even needs an appropiated answer,
> but as I can't see my answering mail
Dear James,
your praising of WP0 surely deserves or even needs an appropiated answer,
but as I can't see my answering mail to Gerard's input from yesterday
published in this mailinglist so I will wait until this "moderated".
When I see that my email with the answer to Gerard is published in the
Jens,
Why do you say net neutrality has anything to do with price? It's about
best-effort delivery of packets without censorship or, for example,
treating packets that say "do you want to join our radical fundamentalist
agnostic cell," the same way as we treat packets that say, "do you want to
sub
