On 15 September 2014 19:24, Danny Horn wrote:
> Some people are seeing Flow messages as really important, something that
> they want to get updates on right away -- and "right away" can mean either
> in their watchlist where they go all the time, or in Echo where they'll see
> the notification. Ot
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Danny Horn wrote:
> Figuring out how Flow integrates with the watchlist and Echo is one of the
> toughest and most important parts of the project.
I think that may be an overstatement. I'm not saying it isn't tough, but
exploring in what ways wikipages are curre
Minutes and slides from the recent quarterly review of the
Foundation's Language Engineering team are available at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Language_Engineering/September_2014
.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> H
Diego, that is definitely what we're thinking about for the subscriptions
options -- giving users the ability to choose whether they want to
subscribe to every new thread, or just get a notification that a new thread
has been created. The balance that we have to figure out is how to provide
options
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jan Ainali wrote:
> 2014-09-15 23:54 GMT+02:00 James Salsman :
>
> > In the recent discussion of editor engagement effectiveness on
> > wiki-research-l, the question of Flow's affect on talk page wikitext
> > practice arose. I would like to know whether anyone sha
Dear all,
I just wanted to draw your attention to some really interesting information
about how boards in the Wikimedia movement work.
Jessie Wild in the WMF Grantmaking team conducted a survey of movement
organisation board members (Chapters, Thorgs and the Foundation) and the
results are here:
Lsjbot has now completed its run of generating articles for all species,
with 310 000 on plants, making the total number generated above 1 300
000 (source used: Catalogue of Life). With Naskobot, having earlier
generated some 85 000 articles on Swedish lakes and French communes
etc., the total
Howdy all,
One thing I've noticed in my short time as an active part of our
community is that the more welcoming and likable aspects of our
individual personalities aren't reflect in our most public
conversations. For example, if a new editor went by this forum alone,
we might come off as taking o
Impressive piece of work. I agree, it is a lot easier to expand on an article
with a well formatted stub than to create a new one if you are not familiar
with the process. I would like to see this procedure extended to other
Wikipedias, including en: for classes of article for which there is co
