The banner without the ribbon is good, but the ribbon is unnecessary and
too flashy IMHO, I asked several people and didn't get even one positive
feedback. And my friends agreed it is the ribbon. We could use something
else to make the banner noticeable, now it's noticeable but in a bad way.
Best
Aye, I asked a designer to give some nice options and presented them to the
committee. While there are certainly some people who have not liked the
banner I have generally heard good feedback overall from community members
(significantly more good then bad) and have made adjustments to the banner
t
I should note it was a WMF design consultant that did this and not a
volunteer (well - that it was not a committee volunteer I can verify). My
understanding was they were working from UX team's guidelines as they
design other banners for WMF. The request that we received was to go with a
banner des
Oh, it's not about the idea of banners or about their usual performance,
it's about this particular ribbon. When I set anonnotice or sitenotice on a
big wiki, I aim the statement to be aligned with UX... discoveries. Don't
set extensive dark backgrounds (unless it's about to be
accessibility-orient
I appreciate that there are basically always concerns with our banners.
Generally, I hear from volunteers on nearly every banner we use. ;)
That said, it would be helpful to have some more constructive feedback to
pass along to the next committee. What exactly would you suggest be
changed? Passing
To be clear by "our banners" I meant Wikimedia banners - not elections
banners. ;)
-greg
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Gregory Varnum
wrote:
> I appreciate that there are basically always concerns with our banners.
> Generally, I hear from volunteers on nearly every banner we use. ;)
>
> Th
Looks fine to me.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Szymon Grabarczuk <
tar.locesil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I must agree with that. I've received clearly negative feedback from
> several volunteers.
>
> On 22 April 2015 at 13:18, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
>
> > It's horribly ugly, I expected more.
>
I must agree with that. I've received clearly negative feedback from
several volunteers.
On 22 April 2015 at 13:18, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
> It's horribly ugly, I expected more.
>
> I don't want to de-value someone's work (a person or persons that I don't
> know) but we had way better designs bef
It's horribly ugly, I expected more.
I don't want to de-value someone's work (a person or persons that I don't
know) but we had way better designs before.
Best
--
Amir
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Maili
