Ok sorry, I could only read the text of the email, I can't open the images
from here right now, my bad.
JP
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 28 July 2017 at 13:28, Jean-Philippe Béland
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do no
On 28 July 2017 at 13:28, Jean-Philippe Béland wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not
> claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures
> of it". Even if an object is in the public domain, the actual physical
> object is still th
Exposed = exhibited. My French is taking over.
JP
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jean-Philippe Béland wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not
> claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures
> of it". Even if an object is in
Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but from what I read they do not
claim copyright over the objects. They only tell you "do not take pictures
of it". Even if an object is in the public domain, the actual physical
object is still their property and they can do whatever they want with it,
it does
"On 28 July 2017 at 13:02, Fæ wrote:
> The Tullie House Museum in Carlisle has a number of objects on loan
> from the British Museum,[3] and it appears that it is only those
> objects that have any restrictions on photography. I took photographs
> of two of these (without any flash), as the restr