James Heilman wrote:
> We need to make our current Wikipedias simpler. Yes I know it is
> an uphill battle but we just need more people working on it.
That is why, as I have announced previously, I will soon begin raising
money for the human fact-checkers and proofreaders necessary for the
http:/
Hi!
I do not think language discrimination is the only possible discrimination.
I would prefer and consider it better if the international organisation
would be located next to the office of a local chapter. Then a different
perspective is possible.
Also I would like to suggest to have an WMF off
A few thoughts:
1) We do not need more simple language Wikipedias. We need to make our
current Wikipedias simplier. Yes I know it is an uphill battle but we just
need more people working on it.
2) It is the editors of content who have the greater authority. Editors are
somewhat curtained by what
Hoi,
Well when he does not have a better point of view, he has hardly any
arguments at all. Just as if French students will not suffer for the lack
of a freedom of panorama. Where does it say students have money to spend on
"professional" pictures and where does it say they should?
Thanks,
Ger
Wikimedia's current structure makes us vulnerable for beeing labelled as
u.s. american monopoly by jeanmarie cavada, French member of the European
Parliament:
http://jeanmariecavada.eu/ma-position-sur-le-droit-de-panorama/
Best
Rupert
On Jun 28, 2015 5:42 PM, "Gerard Meijssen"
wrote:
> Hoi,
> I
Hoi,
I did not talk about language discrimination. I talked about preference for
USA activities. That is what chapters are about.
Thanks.
GerardM
On 28 June 2015 at 14:18, James Salsman wrote:
> GerardM,
>
> Which do you think would end more language discrimination: a WMF
> co-headquarters
I worry that these three options are unecessarily exclusive and probably a
bit simplistic. Why suggest these three?
On 28 Jun 2015 13:27, "James Salsman" wrote:
> GerardM,
>
> Which do you think would end more language discrimination: a WMF
> co-headquarters in Belgium, moving the WEF to Germany,
Why not have a chapter that is physically close to the WMF in e.g. Tijuana?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:18 PM, James Salsman wrote:
> GerardM,
>
> Which do you think would end more language discrimination: a WMF
> co-headquarters in Belgium, moving the WEF to Germany, or a Simple language
> Wikipe
