Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-07-02 Thread David Richfield
That's the nice thing about the Internet: What Wikipedia doesn't want, some people will host, and what they don't want, some other people will host. Everyone has standards; the standards just differ from project to project. On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Mike Dupont wrote: > well i can give yo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-07-01 Thread Mike Dupont
well i can give you copies of the scripts, the articles are still on archive org, I dont want to host them, mike On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: > > Better would be to keep those articles, and also (at some point) to preserve > TVTropes. > > sincerely, > Kim Bruning >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-07-01 Thread Kim Bruning
Better would be to keep those articles, and also (at some point) to preserve TVTropes. sincerely, Kim Bruning On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:17:57PM +, Mike Dupont wrote: > well i decided to delete them, and other articles dealing with peoples > personal lives. > I dont want to de

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-28 Thread Mike Dupont
well i decided to delete them, and other articles dealing with peoples personal lives. I dont want to deal with stuff like that, mike On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Mike Dupont wrote: > Well you think i should delete them from the speedydeletion wikia? > http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote: > On 27/06/2012 12:10 AM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kim Bruning >>  wrote: >>> >>> The SOPA strike was necessary for us to retain neutrality. >> >> Figuratively speaking, or do you think it actually made a whit o

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Mike Dupont
Well you think i should delete them from the speedydeletion wikia? http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/index.php?search=rape&fulltext=Search mike On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: > > Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has been > forced to censor

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Andreas Kolbe wrote: >On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, David Gerard wrote: >> This is pretty much completely wrong, as you'd know if you'd read the >> links at the beginning. The pages were already marked "don't put ads >> here". Google objected to their presence on the site at all. The pages >>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 27 June 2012 16:02, David Richfield wrote: > > > This must be the most misleading mailing list title I've seen in a > > long time. Almost all of these tropes are untouched: > > > http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SexualHarassmen

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread David Gerard
On 27 June 2012 16:30, David Richfield wrote: > Wow, they moved fast!  I read the blog post and then went to check, > and found the supposedly deleted articles up, less than a full day > after the original mailing list email, so I assumed there had to be > some mistake.  How long were the article

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread David Richfield
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:10 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 27 June 2012 16:02, David Richfield wrote: > >> This must be the most misleading mailing list title I've seen in a >> long time.  Almost all of these tropes are untouched: >> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SexualHarassmentAndRa

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread David Gerard
On 27 June 2012 16:02, David Richfield wrote: > This must be the most misleading mailing list title I've seen in a > long time.  Almost all of these tropes are untouched: > http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SexualHarassmentAndRapeTropes?from=Main.RapeTropes > - it seems they just had a p

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread David Richfield
This must be the most misleading mailing list title I've seen in a long time. Almost all of these tropes are untouched: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SexualHarassmentAndRapeTropes?from=Main.RapeTropes - it seems they just had a problem with Google withdrawing ad revenue because they h

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread David Gerard
On 27 June 2012 05:59, geni wrote: > On 27 June 2012 05:15, Andreas Kolbe wrote: >> I was actually thinking of the board, or just Jimbo himself, rather than >> any wider group of luminaries (or actual Wikipedia editors). If Google >> wanted something, I am sure they would speak in person to the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Theo10011 wrote: > So, a chain of events during a 4 month period can not be incidental. What > you neglect to mention that there was an annual fundraiser during the end > of the year, this was not the first grant Google made to Wikimedia, in > fact, it might not e

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Marc A. Pelletier
On 27/06/2012 12:10 AM, Anthony wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: The SOPA strike was necessary for us to retain neutrality. Figuratively speaking, or do you think it actually made a whit of difference? I'm pretty sure it had an effect; if only that of increased medi

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Philippe Beaudette
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Tim Starling wrote: > > Actually, the SOPA blackout notice was developed and deployed by WMF > staff. Point of clarification: Developed and deployed, yes - but at the request of the English Wikipedia community, in the form of the RFC that was run. Staff devel

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-27 Thread Tim Starling
On 27/06/12 06:46, Nathan wrote: > It's simple. The WMF didn't do anything. The English Wikipedia did. That > project effectively changed the content of the entire encyclopedia for > political reasons. Actually, the SOPA blackout notice was developed and deployed by WMF staff.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread geni
On 27 June 2012 05:15, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > Perhaps so. :)) (But clearly, so have you.) The difference being that I've been following Wikipedia criticism for much longer to the point where I can just view it as a rather repetitive soap opera. > I was actually thinking of the board, or just Jim

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Theo10011
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > I was actually thinking of the board, or just Jimbo himself, rather than > any wider group of luminaries (or actual Wikipedia editors). If Google > wanted something, I am sure they would speak in person to the people they > have had personal

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:24 PM, geni wrote: > On 26 June 2012 21:38, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > > Are you not being a bit naive here? Seriously, if Google wanted > something, > > and were willing to pay Wikimedia another half million dollars for it, > > they'd talk to Jimbo and other WMF luminarie

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: > The SOPA strike was necessary for us to retain neutrality. Figuratively speaking, or do you think it actually made a whit of difference? ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread MZMcBride
Kim Bruning wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:07:02PM +0100, Andreas Kolbe wrote: >> I've always been against ads, but as far as I am concerned, the illusion of >> an NPOV project ended with the SOPA strike, and Jimbo's current exploits >> around O'Dwyer (who I agree should not be extradited, but

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Nathan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Nathan wrote: > >It's simple. The WMF didn't do anything. The English Wikipedia did. That > >project effectively changed the content of the entire encyclopedia for > >political reasons. That is the condicio sine qua non for abandoning >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Nathan wrote: >It's simple. The WMF didn't do anything. The English Wikipedia did. That >project effectively changed the content of the entire encyclopedia for >political reasons. That is the condicio sine qua non for abandoning >neutrality. You might say it was done for great reasons, and that i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread geni
On 26 June 2012 21:38, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > Are you not being a bit naive here? Seriously, if Google wanted something, > and were willing to pay Wikimedia another half million dollars for it, > they'd talk to Jimbo and other WMF luminaries behind closed doors. You've been hanging out on wikiped

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Nathan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > > > I've never understood why that was considered non-neutral. WMF, as an > > entity, can have viewpoints, especially as relates to the organization > > itself. The WMF, for example, is not neut

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > Well, there is a slashdot report. Let's see how much Google get pilloried > for their actions with regard to TV Tropes. My prediction: not much. > Oops, that slashdot report is from November 2010, and refers to the last time Google put TV T

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Nathan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > I've never understood why that was considered non-neutral. WMF, as an > entity, can have viewpoints, especially as relates to the organization > itself. The WMF, for example, is not neutral on the question of > whether or not people should make

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > > Besides, the ones putting pressure on TV Tropes, and who made them take > the > > pages down, are Google. > > > > That is the same Google who are a major financial contributor to > Wikimedia. > > True. But if Google told WMF "Change Foo and B

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Kim Bruning
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:07:02PM +0100, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > > I've always been against ads, but as far as I am concerned, the illusion of > an NPOV project ended with the SOPA strike, and Jimbo's current exploits > around O'Dwyer (who I agree should not be extradited, but doh, that is not > t

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andre Engels
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote: > On 26/06/2012 2:02 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: >> >> Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has been >> forced to censor a >> number of pages due to advertiser pressure. >> > > And thus is the wisdom of eschewing adve

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Todd Allen
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > >> Perhaps the next time someone brings up the "WMF should accept ads!" >> bit, we can point back to this thread to explain why when we respond >> "That would be the end of neutrality," we

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Kim Bruning
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:41:04PM +0100, geni wrote: > On 26 June 2012 19:02, Kim Bruning wrote: > > In the mean time, the discussed tropes *do* exist in our culture and in our > > movies. It > > somehow feels soviet. :-/ > > A significant chunk of them would probably fail [[WP:V]]. Actually fo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > Perhaps the next time someone brings up the "WMF should accept ads!" > bit, we can point back to this thread to explain why when we respond > "That would be the end of neutrality," we are not exaggerating. > I've always been against ads, but

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Marc A. Pelletier
On 26/06/2012 3:59 PM, Nathan wrote: Someone else will just cleverly point out the differences between Wikipedia and TVTropes, which are many. Using a wiki platform does not make comparisons between the two apples to apples. No, but that's besides the point. The point is simple: if you rely

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Nathan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Todd Allen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Marc A. Pelletier > wrote: > > On 26/06/2012 2:02 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: > >> > >> Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has > been > >> forced to censor a > >> number of pages due to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Todd Allen
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote: > On 26/06/2012 2:02 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: >> >> Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has been >> forced to censor a >> number of pages due to advertiser pressure. >> > > And thus is the wisdom of eschewing adve

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread geni
On 26 June 2012 20:30, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > As far as I can make out, the problem was that they could no longer keep up > with moderating these pages, and that the content turned creepier and > creepier. Its more complicated than that. Apart from anything else TVTropes have been drifting in th

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread geni
On 26 June 2012 19:02, Kim Bruning wrote: > In the mean time, the discussed tropes *do* exist in our culture and in our > movies. It > somehow feels soviet. :-/ A significant chunk of them would probably fail [[WP:V]]. Actually for the most part I just feel sorry for the people who are meant to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Andreas Kolbe
As far as I can make out, the problem was that they could no longer keep up with moderating these pages, and that the content turned creepier and creepier. ---o0o--- @ Marq FJA Eddie tends to be a little abrupt in his explanations. The gist of it is that rape (much like sex and other similar to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Marc A. Pelletier
On 26/06/2012 2:02 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has been forced to censor a number of pages due to advertiser pressure. And thus is the wisdom of eschewing advertizement and sponsorship highlighted for all too see. I've always suppo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] TVTropes deletes all pages with "Rape" in title under advertising pressure.

2012-06-26 Thread Kim Bruning
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:02:55PM +0200, Kim Bruning wrote: > > Wow, thank goodness we never had advertising. The TV-Tropes wiki has been > forced to censor a > number of pages due to advertiser pressure. The wiki-community is apparantly working on it: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki