On 2016-02-26 00:16, Sydney Poore wrote:
The idea of a non-voting seat for a non C-level employee is something
that
I could support.
Sydney
Sydney Poore
User:FloNight
Wikipedian in Residence
at Cochrane Collaboration
Actually, it could be more observers (non-voting seats) than just one;
The idea of a non-voting seat for a non C-level employee is something that
I could support.
Sydney
Sydney Poore
User:FloNight
Wikipedian in Residence
at Cochrane Collaboration
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Vi to wrote:
> 2016-02-25 23:34 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic
2016-02-25 23:34 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic :
> I stopped responding to other emails because the significance of this
> moment is so large, that we have now we didn't have since the
> beginnings of Wikipedia.
>
> We've got the chance to rebuild the movement.
>
I was about to write
This is an exceptionally well said statement by Millosh. Frankly,
shortening it would probably have lessened the impact of it. So
respectfully I disagree with my friend Mard. :)
On Thursday, February 25, 2016, Dan Andreescu
wrote:
> Milos's subject line is a good
Milos's subject line is a good tl;dr; though : )
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Mardetanha
wrote:
> first revolutionary action would be to force millosh to write shorter and
> more concise emails
>
> Mardetanha
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Dan Andreescu
first revolutionary action would be to force millosh to write shorter and
more concise emails
Mardetanha
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Dan Andreescu
wrote:
> I agree, Milos, this is one hell of a moment. I will treat this moment
> with the utmost respect.
>
> I
I agree, Milos, this is one hell of a moment. I will treat this moment
with the utmost respect.
I also love that we have made this connection, on this list, on Facebook,
on the wikis, with some great community members. You're right, we should
cherish this.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:34 PM,