I don't think it is useful to discuss projects and people, discuss
processes and fixes.
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Lodewijk
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Could you provide a bit more context? From which language are you drawing
> these experiences? Did you consider filing a phabricator request for
Note, this thread was forked into a different subject/title.
See - "[Wikimedia-l] machine translation" - for newer discussion and detail.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https:
Hi John,
Could you provide a bit more context? From which language are you drawing
these experiences? Did you consider filing a phabricator request for the
technical component that can be improved (if so, could you link to it)?
Could you also provide some links to these discussions that are causin
Many of the volunteers I work with really like the "Content Translation"
tool. Machine translation only exists in some languages. For many it is not
an option at all.
Yes peer review processes are needed, and yes doing follow up and inviting
new people to our movement is a lot of work (I do a fair
