https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
The 'Thanks report' is up and running again, after being out of action
for the last few months. This seems down to time-outs when running the
query for wikidata, along with Faebot being throttled on labs (now
relaxed) and the more recent account p
Hello Fae,
Are you generating json somewhere or thiking to create an API for that
information?
I have some ideas that I started to develop last year, I will ping you in
private.
Best regards and thanks by helping us with the important information.
Rodrigo Padula
2015-02-26 14:01 GMT-03:00 Fæ :
Now the run has been running a bit longer, it can be seen[1] that the
real sink is the logging table from wikidata. Other projects are
pretty quick from a few minutes to Commons taking half an hour.
Wikidata takes 7 hours for each query. It's a big log!
I am testing out separating wikidata from th
Fæ wrote:
>Re: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
>
>I am glad the tables are useful, hopefully stimulating more positive
>use of the thanks notifier by contributors.
>
>The reports are updating *slowly*, currently at April 2014... This is
>in part because of the WMFlabs outage yest
Re:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
I am glad the tables are useful, hopefully stimulating more positive
use of the thanks notifier by contributors.
The reports are updating *slowly*, currently at April 2014... This is
in part because of the WMFlabs outage yesterday, though in g
Excellent!!
Great initiative, congratulations!
Thank you for answering my request for inclusion of pt.wikipedia!
Best regards
Rodrigo Padula
2015-02-23 12:57 GMT-03:00, Fæ :
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
>
> I have now set up a monthly report of the top 10 "thankers" /
>
Hi, an outcome of the old milgram experiments suggests that not always nice
people do oppress others less:
http://m.mic.com/articles/92479/psychologists-have-uncovered-a-troubling-feature-of-people-who-seem-nice-all-the-time
Rupert
On Feb 25, 2015 8:31 AM, "Ricordisamoa"
wrote:
> Thanks Fæ, tho
Thanks Fæ, those reports are very interesting from my perspective.
However, even though the number of thanks received may be more reliable
than the usual edit count, none of them could ever measure the
invaluable impact of our contributors :-)
Il 23/02/2015 16:57, Fæ ha scritto:
https://meta.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
I have now set up a monthly report of the top 10 "thankers" /
"thankees" with an index to the different project reports on the above
link. These have been generated retrospectively for 2014 and I will
shortly set this up on WMF labs to run at the
Fæ, 05/02/2015 18:47:
Top 10*most thanked* users in Jan 2015:
English Wikipedia:
Looks like edit wars pay back in this rank.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@li
Luckily we can find out who was thanked too, it takes the same time to
run. Data below and link for updated report (which is on wikitech due
to WMF server outage for main projects at the time of writing).
*
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:F%C3%A6/sandbox&oldid=143073
Extend
A good idea! I think "thanks divided by edit count" would be nice to see,
too - that way power users and regular users can be compared!
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Cha
On 5 February 2015 at 10:47, Fæ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After reading an interesting related discussion on GenderGap, I have
> queried the top 10 users of the thanks feature last month, on both the
> English Wikipedia and Commons. Snapshot image attached and report link
> below.
>
> Perhaps someone migh
Glad to see me there. :)
Regards,
Jee
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Richard Farmbrough wrote:
> Who was most thanked?
>
> On 5 February 2015 at 15:47, Fæ wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > After reading an interesting related discussion on GenderGap, I have
> > queried the top 10 users of the thanks f
Who was most thanked?
On 5 February 2015 at 15:47, Fæ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After reading an interesting related discussion on GenderGap, I have
> queried the top 10 users of the thanks feature last month, on both the
> English Wikipedia and Commons. Snapshot image attached and report link
> below.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo