Aah, okay, thanks for clearing it up!
:)
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Anivar Aravind wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan <
> srik.r...@wikimedia.in> wrote:
>
>> Shyamal,
>> Is this rule an unwritten rule or is it a proper legal law of sorts?
>> If photograph
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan <
srik.r...@wikimedia.in> wrote:
> Shyamal,
> Is this rule an unwritten rule or is it a proper legal law of sorts?
> If photography is legally banned, then all these photographs would be
> technically in violation of the law right?
>
It was
Dear all,
Wiki Loves Monuments India 2013 has started. You might have been seeing
banners in all Wikimedia sites. www.wikilovesmonuments.in Do participate
and encourage your friends and everyone else to participate too.
A very thanks to all the volunteers who have helped us so far, and who will
b
Shyamal,
Is this rule an unwritten rule or is it a proper legal law of sorts?
If photography is legally banned, then all these photographs would be
technically in violation of the law right?
Sent from the touchscreen equivalent of a Nokia 1100, pardon the sender.
--
Srikanth Ramakrishnan,
Treasur
It is very important to read this too along with the news:
The officials wanted to grab the photographs, but without any attributions
to the photographers themselves. As usual, these photos will later appear
in costly or otherwise Govt. publications, promptly and sacredly credited
to the photogra
I was told some years ago that a forest minister had passed a rule that no
photography was to be allowed in any forest areas in Kerala. Any forest in
that including Reserve Forests, in which one is *even* allowed to graze
cattle, collect firewood and minor forest produce. I was just trying to
look
