Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

30 From: ashwin.bain...@gmail.com To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011 Thanks for the suggestion, Srikanth . Did that. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANoticeboard_for_India-r

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Thanks for the suggestion, Srikanth . Did that. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANoticeboard_for_India-related_topics&action=historysubmit&diff=463088930&oldid=463082772 Please give your views here,everyone rather than on email - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_t

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 15:59, Ashwin Baindur wrote: > Do we have consensus for reducing to two. Any objections or alternatives > proposed? I think WT:INB might be better place, just because it is more representative than this list for asking any feedback IMO. -- Regards Srikanth.L ___

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

le which was > demoted and has now reattained GA status. > > > > -- > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:06:18 +0530 > From: ashwin.bain...@gmail.com > To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collab

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

the Mumbai article which was demoted and has now reattained GA status. Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:06:18 +0530 From: ashwin.bain...@gmail.com To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011 Naveen, I think COTM

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Naveen, I think COTM is not the place where red links can be developed into stubs, start of even B class articles. The final outcome that we can hope for is that certain articles are : * Raised to FA/GA quality if not status (or at least) * Get improved by numerous edits (or at least) * Get impro

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Hey, I'm really optimistic, that we can go forward with this. Seeing the number of English editors is on a rise and enthusiasm of several people, especially Pradeep Mohandas, I'm really sure that this will and shall work. ---Regards, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Hisham wrote: > > > On Nov 29

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Naveen Francis wrote: > It may not work :( > Tried earlier > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Collaborations_of_the_month > > -- > naveenpf > if at first you don't suceed... :-) btw, today I read an article yesterday about Ratan Tata and how he institutionalized

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

It may not work :( Tried earlier http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Collaborations_of_the_month -- naveenpf On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ashwin Baindur wrote: > Now, I want to raise another point. Do we really have the wherewithal for > a 5 article collaboration? I think that is too optimistic,

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Ashwin Baindur wrote: > Now, I want to raise another point. Do we really have the wherewithal for a 5 > article collaboration? I think that is too optimistic, perhaps we should have > a two article collaboration to begin with each month? My personal view is that an

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Now, I want to raise another point. Do we really have the wherewithal for a 5 article collaboration? I think that is too optimistic, perhaps we should have a two article collaboration to begin with each month? Warm regards, Ashwin Baindur -- O

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan < parakara.gh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Naveen, I believe INCOTM is happening after two and a half years. > Remember Transport in India ??? > Very much; We need to do similar collaborative efforts to make more GAs in http://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Naveen, I believe INCOTM is happening after two and a half years. Remember Transport in India ??? To everyone else, this is an excellent opportunity to start and get a good section of high quality India articles. This has been VERY successful in the past, as I have PERSONALLY seen. I once nominated

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

+1, After a long time. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Ashwin Baindur wrote: > Please consider > nominatingarticles > for Collaboration of the Month (COTM). > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wik

[Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

Please consider nominatingarticles for Collaboration of the Month (COTM). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Collaborations_of_the_month/Nominations Upto 5 articles can be selec